-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/05/12 15:50, Tom Kent wrote:
>> But... I don't think that OpenVPN is the right approach as it is
> not peer-to-peer solution.
>
> I agree that this is not the optimal solution, especially for
> large/high bandwith setups. I was just looking for
> But... I don't think that OpenVPN is the right approach as it is not
> peer-to-peer
solution.
I agree that this is not the optimal solution, especially for large/high
bandwith setups. I was just looking for something that I could get going
with what I have today. My ideal setup would be a centr
From: Adrien Bustany
DAF_INITIAL_AUTH will only be set if a password was needed for client
authentication. This means that for password-less certificate
authentication, no DISCONNECT/ADDRESS messages would be sent.
---
src/openvpn/manage.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletio
From: Adrien Bustany
As discussed in [1], here is a cleaned up version of my patch to fix
the sending of CLIENT:ADDRESS/CLIENT:DISCONNECT message on the
management interface when using password-less TLS certificate
authentication. It seems that DAF_INITIAL_AUTH is now unused, should I
send anothe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/05/12 03:03, Tom Kent wrote:
> I had an idea I wanted to run by people and see if its
> feasiblehere goes.
>
> I've been hearing a lot about "virtualized" networking for VMs and
> that got me thinking. It seems like OpenVPN would be a good t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/05/12 10:30, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
>
>> Jan Just Keijser wrote:
>>> ouch: http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20120419.txt
>>>
>>> we need to investigate whether and how openvpn is affected.
>>>
>>>
>> did somebody end up writing an 'authorit
> Jan Just Keijser wrote:
>> ouch:
>> http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20120419.txt
>>
>> we need to investigate whether and how openvpn is affected.
>>
>>
> did somebody end up writing an 'authoritative' answer to the question if
> and how openvpn is affected by this bug?
>
> cheers,
>
> JJK
> Hello David,
>
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:33 AM, David Sommerseth
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> The reason I don't see the benefit of splitting out the plug-ins as
>> much is that they all depend on OpenVPN. You can not make much use of
>> these plug-ins without having OpenVPN. But with Windows TAP dri
Hi,
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:03:17PM -0400, Tom Kent wrote:
> The idea I had, and wanted to run by, was if it would be possible to
> integrate an openvpn client into the hypervisor's virtual network card.
> This would make it so that from the moment the VM boots up, it is only
> connected to the
> Jan Just Keijser wrote:
>> ouch:
>> http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20120419.txt
>>
>> we need to investigate whether and how openvpn is affected.
>>
>>
> did somebody end up writing an 'authoritative' answer to the question if
> and how openvpn is affected by this bug?
>
> cheers,
>
> JJK
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Tom Kent wrote:
> I had an idea I wanted to run by people and see if its feasiblehere
> goes.
>
> I've been hearing a lot about "virtualized" networking for VMs and that got
> me thinking. It seems like OpenVPN would be a good tool that could join a
> group of V
Jan Just Keijser wrote:
ouch:
http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20120419.txt
we need to investigate whether and how openvpn is affected.
did somebody end up writing an 'authoritative' answer to the question if
and how openvpn is affected by this bug?
cheers,
JJK
Hi Adriaan,
Adriaan de Jong wrote:
+void
+tls_ctx_load_ecdh_params (struct tls_root_ctx *ctx, const char
*curve_name
+)
+{
+#ifdef USE_SSL_EC
+ if (curve_name != NULL)
+ {
+int nid;
+EC_KEY *ecdh = NULL;
+
+nid = OBJ_sn2nid(curve_name);
+
+if (nid == 0)
I had an idea I wanted to run by people and see if its feasiblehere
goes.
I've been hearing a lot about "virtualized" networking for VMs and that got
me thinking. It seems like OpenVPN would be a good tool that could join a
group of VMs into their own private LAN, basically segregating them fr
14 matches
Mail list logo
