Re: [Openvpn-devel] Summary of the IRC meeting (30th June 2011)

2011-07-01 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 07:29:47PM +0200, Heiko Hund wrote: > Have you guys considered autotools for building native WIN32 binaries in > cygwin? We use it for building openvpn itself. With a little effort one could > even build the driver, sign the binaries and create the installer using mak

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Summary of the IRC meeting (30th June 2011)

2011-07-01 Thread Heiko Hund
On Friday 01 July 2011 16:12:52 Samuli Seppänen wrote: > Discussed the domake-win (mingw) and Python-based buildsystems used on > Windows: > > > > Agreed that the domake-win buildsystem will has some rough edges and it > needs moderni

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Patch for HTTP Proxy with NTLM or error: NTLM Proxy-Authorization phase 3 failed: received corrupted data from proxy server

2011-07-01 Thread chantra
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 14:37 +0200, Pierre Crokaert wrote: > Hello, > > This kind of error occurs with some HTTP proxy. This happens when the > response from the server in phase 2 is longer than 128 bytes, in that > case the response is truncated because we are only interrested by the > beginni

[Openvpn-devel] Possible bug with loss of routes.

2011-07-01 Thread Brad Dameron (Ericsson)
Using openvpn 2.2.0. If I have my connections established, then I unplug my Ethernet to simulate a loss of Internet and keep this unplugged for say 30 minutes for an extended loss. Then plug the cable back in and openvpn then re-establishes it's connection. The routes are then lost that the VPN

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Summary of the IRC meeting (30th June 2011)

2011-07-01 Thread Adriaan de Jong
> -Original Message- > From: Adriaan de Jong [mailto:dej...@fox-it.com] > Sent: vrijdag 1 juli 2011 17:25 > To: Samuli Seppänen; openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] Summary of the IRC meeting (30th June > 2011) > > The github page is available at https://gith

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Summary of the IRC meeting (30th June 2011)

2011-07-01 Thread Adriaan de Jong
The github page is available at https://github.com/andj/openvpn-ssl-refactoring . Note that the version up there currently is broken :(, as PolarSSL integration is a work in progress. > -Original Message- > From: Samuli Seppänen [mailto:sam...@openvpn.net] > Sent: vrijdag 1 juli 2011 16:

[Openvpn-devel] Summary of the IRC meeting (30th June 2011)

2011-07-01 Thread Samuli Seppänen
Hi, Here's the summary of the previous community meeting. --- COMMUNITY MEETING Place: #openvpn-devel on irc.freenode.net List-Post: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Thursday, 30th June 2011 Time: 18:00 UTC Planned meeting topics for this meeting were on this page:

[Openvpn-devel] Patch for HTTP Proxy with NTLM or error: NTLM Proxy-Authorization phase 3 failed: received corrupted data from proxy server

2011-07-01 Thread Pierre Crokaert
Hello, This kind of error occurs with some HTTP proxy. This happens when the response from the server in phase 2 is longer than 128 bytes, in that case the response is truncated because we are only interrested by the beginning, but as it is still in base 64 format when it is truncated, it mus

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Fixes to easy-rsa/2.0

2011-07-01 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 01.07.2011 10:26, schrieb David Sommerseth: > Agreed, and we decided yesterday in the developers meeting to remove 0.9.6 > support. However we found it better to remove that support first in > OpenVPN 2.3, as we will then go through the source code and remove all > 0.9.6 related stuff in the s

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Fixes to easy-rsa/2.0

2011-07-01 Thread David Sommerseth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 30/06/11 11:10, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 30.06.2011 09:59, schrieb sam...@openvpn.net: >> From: Samuli Seppänen >> >> As support for OpenSSL 1.0.0 requires a modified openssl.cnf file, it was >> decided to rename openssl.cnf to openssl-1.0.0.cnf

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [Openvpn-users] DNS Issue

2011-07-01 Thread Russell Morris
Hi Brett, Sorry, a bit confused here - why are you referring to OpenDNS? Thanks, ... Russell On Thu, 06/30/2011 07:20 AM, Brett Serkez wrote: > The problem is that OpenDNS always provides a response which defeats any > local name resolution. > > Under advanced settings, see: 'E