Re: [Openvpn-devel] Feature branch drop warning - --passtos and VLAN patch set

> I personally see the a broader use case for the VLAN patches, and I would > *not* like to throw out the VLAN patches in addition. So I therefore see just > a few solutions. I would like to see the VLAN patches go into OpenVPN 2.3. > > *a)* --passtos gets serious testing with responses *back

[Openvpn-devel] Follow-up: --tls-float and protocol changes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In the developers meeting December 2 the patch introducing a --tls-float feature was discussed. The feature itself seems reasonable for several scenarios and makes it possible for a client to change IP address without needing to re-negotiate the TLS

Re: [Openvpn-devel] how to limite the bandwidth of every client ?

Hi, On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 08:42:30AM +0800, hmy wrote: > I'm sorry , I will quit this mail list. sorry! This is somewhat missing the point David made...: > > Third: > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > > A

[Openvpn-devel] Feature branch drop warning - --passtos and VLAN patch set

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 28/02/10 23:07, David Sommerseth wrote: | From: Davide Guerri | | This patch makes it possible to use the --passtos option with 802.1Q tagged | ethernet frames. | | sf.net tracker: |