Samuli,
Please peek this up.
Thanks.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone know why the socklet_t detection was added this way?
>
> I mean the TYPE_SOCKLEN_T m4 macro.
>
> First, it should be sufficient to just try to see if socklen_t is defined.
> Next, on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/09/10 17:18, David Sommerseth wrote:
> The warnings reported where:
>
> misc.c:158: warning: ignoring return value of ‘nice’, declared with attribute
> warn_unused_result
> options.c:4033:
