Hi,
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 03:02:17PM +0200, Eike Lohmann wrote:
> We are also using old openvpn clients with windows, there we have to use
> /30 netmasks (4 ip's) and can only configure 4096 users.
65536 / 4 = 16000 :-) - a /16 pool holds 2^16 addresses, I already took
that into account when a
We are also using old openvpn clients with windows, there we have to use
/30 netmasks (4 ip's) and can only configure 4096 users.
To handle the load on the machines we build a cluster with dynamic
routing and yes, we are getting close to the /16 network limit.
Am 31.08.2010 13:31, schrieb Ge
Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:35:03PM +0200, Eike Lohmann wrote:
In the past only /16 networks were possibel per openvpn instance.
Is it now possibel to define larger networks or define 2x /16 networks
on one openvpn instance?
I assume that you're talking about t
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:35:03PM +0200, Eike Lohmann wrote:
> In the past only /16 networks were possibel per openvpn instance.
> Is it now possibel to define larger networks or define 2x /16 networks
> on one openvpn instance?
I assume that you're talking about this error message:
--se
In the past only /16 networks were possibel per openvpn instance.
Is it now possibel to define larger networks or define 2x /16 networks
on one openvpn instance?
Thanks, Eike
Hi Ansis,
very interesting results, it's been on my TODO list to do some extensive
benchmarking for some time, especially in a 1 Gbps and 10 Gbps network
environment. See some comments below
Ansis Atteka wrote:
Hello
I have done some benchmarking of OpenVPN and wanted to share my
numbers a
