Matthias Andree wrote:
> I'm not sure currently if Solaris /bin/sh likes $(...) notation or
> insists on `...`
`` is the only portable way.
//Peter
pgpbnpSJnBkbG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 06 Jun 2010, Davide Brini wrote:
> Some systems don't install bash or a POSIX sh in /bin, so it may also be
> necessary to create symlinks on those systems. I think it's the easiest
> tradeoff, and should be done anyway, because on such systems many other
> #!/bin/sh or #!/bin/bash scri
Hi,
I have made a patch that would allow plugins to handle accounting
information
for each connecting clients without reading the status file.
Please see https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/ticket/15
But for the obvious benefit that one can check regurlarly how much
bandwidth is used by a user
On 6-Jun-10, at 9:58 AM, Davide Brini wrote:
On Sunday 06 June 2010, Toby Thain wrote:
Most of the common GNU utilities (including gcc) are in the
standard
Solaris install, either via /usr/sfw/ or by using g prefix (e.g.
gawk,
gmake).
Possibly, but it still means that either scripts using
Am 05.06.2010, 22:23 Uhr, schrieb David Sommerseth:
On 05/06/10 00:49, Matthias Andree wrote:
Note that some parts of the scripts may be Solaris /bin/sh unfriendly,
for instance, Solaris's sh doesn't support test -e or [ -e. My patch
does not address this.
This makes me very reluctant from ac
On Sunday 06 June 2010, Toby Thain wrote:
> >> Most of the common GNU utilities (including gcc) are in the standard
> >> Solaris install, either via /usr/sfw/ or by using g prefix (e.g.
> >> gawk,
> >> gmake).
> >
> > Possibly, but it still means that either scripts using standard
> > names and ex
