Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH v2] Do not randomize resolving of IP addresses in getaddr()

2010-02-20 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:57:30PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote: > (I'm withdrawing the first version, and suggesting this patch to be used > instead, > as this one follows the new feature deprecation process.) ACK! gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [IPv6] Merge conflicts in mroute.c

2010-02-20 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 04:53:31PM -0600, Karl O. Pinc wrote: > > As said: I would welcome contact to someone who is using > > uClibc+OpenVPN > > and could help me test this and adapt the code if needed. > > To run the risk of harping on a theme > > If the problem is that someone is './c

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH v2] Do not randomize resolving of IP addresses in getaddr()

2010-02-20 Thread Karl O. Pinc
On 02/19/2010 09:39:40 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote: > If someone who explicitly chooses a functionality > needs to get a warning about the default they > should get this warning at ./configure time -- > the time they make the choice. The only time I can think of that a warning should be delivered to

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH v2] Do not randomize resolving of IP addresses in getaddr()

2010-02-20 Thread Karl O. Pinc
On 02/19/2010 05:11:38 PM, David Sommerseth wrote: > On 20/02/10 00:06, Karl O. Pinc wrote: > > On 02/19/2010 04:57:30 PM, David Sommerseth wrote: > > > > Am I wrong or does using --disable-depr-random-resolv > > not remove the random choice? > > That is correct. According to the newly agreed fea

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] FQDN for routes should expand to all IPs

2010-02-20 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
David Sommerseth wrote: > Unfortunately, it's running on a lot of different embedded systems. > OpenWRT and dd-wrt are just two of many firmwares which ships it. I > would not be surprised if somebody have made VoIP hardware phones which > includes OpenVPN. And these phones could in theory even