Hi,
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:57:30PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
> (I'm withdrawing the first version, and suggesting this patch to be used
> instead,
> as this one follows the new feature deprecation process.)
ACK!
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 04:53:31PM -0600, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> > As said: I would welcome contact to someone who is using
> > uClibc+OpenVPN
> > and could help me test this and adapt the code if needed.
>
> To run the risk of harping on a theme
>
> If the problem is that someone is './c
On 02/19/2010 09:39:40 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> If someone who explicitly chooses a functionality
> needs to get a warning about the default they
> should get this warning at ./configure time --
> the time they make the choice.
The only time I can think of that a warning should
be delivered to
On 02/19/2010 05:11:38 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 20/02/10 00:06, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> > On 02/19/2010 04:57:30 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
> >
> > Am I wrong or does using --disable-depr-random-resolv
> > not remove the random choice?
>
> That is correct. According to the newly agreed fea
David Sommerseth wrote:
> Unfortunately, it's running on a lot of different embedded systems.
> OpenWRT and dd-wrt are just two of many firmwares which ships it. I
> would not be surprised if somebody have made VoIP hardware phones which
> includes OpenVPN. And these phones could in theory even