-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14/12/09 13:52, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
> I can't see any reason why the test scripts should be secret. So better
> have them in the open.
I completely agree! That's the very best approach!
> Do you think it'd be possible to have a
> distributed
David Sommerseth ha scritto:
> On 12/12/09 11:52, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
> >> FWIW using a good (rather than merely adequate) revision control
> >> system makes it much easier to keep the very latest code
> >> on-line and still perform regression tests, keep separate
> >> code branches for feature
David Sommerseth ha scritto:
> On 12/12/09 12:37, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
> > Now, if we want to maintain stability, we need some way to test the
> > patches. Automated tests could be used in many cases but building the
> > test cases takes time. In addition I don't think automated tests catch
> > n
