Siim Põder wrote:
> Hi
>
> Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>> On 04/28/2009 07:43:47 AM, Siim Põder wrote:
>>> Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>> I believe you, but you lost me when it comes to the explanation. What
>> do ssh and grep have to do with adding a hardware encryption card?
>> (I think maybe you're thinking I
On 04/28/2009 02:40:43 PM, Siim Põder wrote:
Yes, I was still talking about additional boxes. HW encryption (as i
see
it) will not help at all, because by the current design, all packets
need to come to userland and go back to kernelland. Most likely to
talk
to the HW encryption device, another
Hi
Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> On 04/28/2009 07:43:47 AM, Siim Põder wrote:
>> Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> I believe you, but you lost me when it comes to the explanation. What
> do ssh and grep have to do with adding a hardware encryption card?
> (I think maybe you're thinking I'm still talking about additio
On 04/28/2009 07:43:47 AM, Siim Põder wrote:
Hi
Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> So, I believe it's easy and cheap to add hardware
> to a OpenVPN box and create a situation where
> the kernel/userspace transition cost does matter.
It's easy and cheap if you add a second box or third. But if you are
appro
Hi
Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> So, I believe it's easy and cheap to add hardware
> to a OpenVPN box and create a situation where
> the kernel/userspace transition cost does matter.
It's easy and cheap if you add a second box or third. But if you are
approaching tens of openvpn boxes (at various locatio
ok, attached
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Yes, I don't think it is maintained.
Please send uniform diff.
Use: "diff -urNp"
--- openvpn.spec.in.orig 2009-04-28 10:14:48.0 +0200
+++ openvpn.spec.in 2009-04-28 10:47:30.0 +0200
@@ -52,8 +52,10 @@ Requires: openssl >= 0.9.6
%
Hm,
I'm talking about the .spec file within the official source tarball. Is
this whats not maintained any more?
Maybe you can accept a patch anyway? I've found out that pkcs11-helper
is an opensuse or Mandriva package, so the patch would look like this:
*** openvpn.spec.in.orig200
Yes, I don't think it is maintained.
Please send uniform diff.
Use: "diff -urNp"
On 4/28/09, Aleksandar Ivanisevic wrote:
>
> Hm,
>
> I'm talking about the .spec file within the official source tarball. Is
> this whats not maintained any more?
>
> Maybe you can accept a patch anyway? I've fo
