Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Some minor comments.
> 1. Please rebase against trunk.
Done.
> > - gateway);
> > + netmask);
> > + if (r->gateway)
> > +argv_printf_cat (&argv, "gw %s", gateway);
> > + else
> > +argv_printf_cat (&argv, "dev %s", r->gateway_ifname);
Some minor comments.
1. Please rebase against trunk.
On 1/29/09, David Balazic wrote:
> diff -u -r openvpn-2.1_rc15/route.c openvpn-2.1_rc15_gwfix/route.c
> --- openvpn-2.1_rc15/route.c2008-11-17 00:48:04.0 +
> +++ openvpn-2.1_rc15_gwfix/route.c 2008-12-18 19:59:36.4553941
Hi!
I'm resending this patch. Originally I sent it here [1].
In short:
In the diff (agains 2.1_rc15) is the solution for the old*
problem of (not) detecting default gateway on linux systems
if it is a device route.
It was tested by one affected user (Antonis Tsolomitis, see the
thread "openvpn a
On 1/29/09, David Balazic wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I sent a patch recently to the openvpn-devel list and got
> no reply whatsoever. Did I miss something ? Is there a procedure
> that I did not follow ?
Send the patch again.
At the subject specify [PATCH]
Place the patch inline, be sure your mail clien
David Sommerseth a écrit :
> From what I've heard from other sources as well, this is usually the
> normal procedure ... pop the patch to this mailing list and watch
> if something happens ... or not you might get a response, and you
> might not. Who knows ...
It is a good summary of t
David Balazic wrote:
Hi!
I sent a patch recently to the openvpn-devel list and got
no reply whatsoever. Did I miss something ? Is there a procedure
that I did not follow ?
From what I've heard from other sources as well, this is usually the
normal procedure ... pop the patch to this mailing
Hi!
I sent a patch recently to the openvpn-devel list and got
no reply whatsoever. Did I miss something ? Is there a procedure
that I did not follow ?
That patch is to fix a longstanding bug that users encountered.
Regards,
David
PS: the mail message in question is :
Fix for "Cannot read curren
