I've just tested this and it seems to work well. Thanks.
James Yonan wrote:
Tim Davies wrote:
After attempting to use OpenVPN 2.1_rc7 on a 64 bit Centos 5
platform, I came across a peculiar error when enabling multihome.
Basically no UDP packets were allowed to send due to an incorrect
size
Stephen Warren wrote:
I run OpenVPN on my laptop, and move between different physical
locations/networks without rebooting my laptop or restarting OpenVPN.
All I do is hibernate/unhibernate.
After unhibernate, OpenVPN correctly detects that its "connection" has
dropped, and attempts to re-initia
Tim Davies wrote:
After attempting to use OpenVPN 2.1_rc7 on a 64 bit Centos 5 platform,
I came across a peculiar error when enabling multihome. Basically no
UDP packets were allowed to send due to an incorrect size being set.
The problem seems to be in socket.c, where sizeof(opi) is incorrec
Francis GUDIN wrote:
Hello,
I submitted a patch through sf.net's interface adding DragonFlyBSD
support:
http://sdf-eu.org/links/1208105125
Please let me know, in case something's wrong with it and I should fix
it.
I've merged this patch into the subversion directory for the 2.1 series:
Josh Cepek wrote:
Under Windows, when run_up_down() from misc.c executes the --up
script, the position of the parameters depends on the device name of
the tun/tap adapter. For example, a default installation creates a
device that may be called "Local Area Connection 2" (number varies),
but th
Mirek Zajic wrote:
I'm sending NTLMv2 patch again. I hope that everything is correct now
:-) Again thanks to Alon for his feedback.
Miroslav Zajic
NextSoft s.r.o.
P.S. I moved int64 macros to ntlm.c. I left them unchanged, becouse they
could be useful in future.
Mirek, can you send t
