[Openvpn-devel] failure delivery

2006-04-28 Thread MAILER-DAEMON
Message from yahoo.com. Unable to deliver message to the following address(es). : This address no longer accepts mail. --- Original message follows. Return-Path: The original message is over 5k. Message truncated to 1K. X-Rocket-Spam: 202.169.224.68 X-YahooFilteredBulk: 202.169.224.68 X-Roc

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Stick routes to interfaces for Linux

2006-04-28 Thread Petre Rodan
Hi Roy, On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 12:28:46PM +0100, Roy Marples wrote: > On Monday 17 April 2006 18:22, Petre Rodan wrote: > > I have the following on the server's setup: > > > > push "route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0" > > push "route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0" > > push "redirect-gateway local" > > .. snip .. >

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Stick routes to interfaces for Linux

2006-04-28 Thread Roy Marples
On Monday 17 April 2006 18:22, Petre Rodan wrote: > I have the following on the server's setup: > > push "route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0" > push "route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0" > push "redirect-gateway local" .. snip .. > > but with a patched beta14 version, I end up having 2 default gateways: > > it basic

[Openvpn-devel] Overhead question

2006-04-28 Thread Schlaffer Viktor
Hi! I have a question about the overall overhead of OpenVPN. I'm using AES-128-CBC with lzo compression. OpenVPN says these numbers during the init phase: EF:58 - i think this is the actual overhead, without the tunnel. Is it right? EB:23 - this is an extra buffer for lzo?(can i reduce this some