> > For the others who suggested reducing mss values and such - I'm
> > already doing it. In fact I have mss clamped down to 1312 right now for
> > testing. But, mss clamping doesn't have anything to do with the loss of the
> > lcp-echo frames I was complaining about.
> >
> Janne also suggest
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Mike Ireton wrote:
For the others who suggested reducing mss values and such - I'm
already doing it. In fact I have mss clamped down to 1312 right now for
testing. But, mss clamping doesn't have anything to do with the loss of the
lcp-echo frames I was complaining about.
