Re: [Openvpn-devel] Re: Re: Radius support (Authentification, Authorization and Accounting)

2005-05-31 Thread Ralf Lübben
Ok, I implemented a list. Everytime a user connects he gets the least number which is free or a new number is added to the list. But how do you want to create the ip address pool? Every client needs two ip addresses for one interface. I get the framed ip address from the radius answer packet. The

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Re: Re: Radius support (Authentification, Authorization and Accounting)

2005-05-31 Thread Torge Szczepanek
Am Dienstag, den 31.05.2005, 10:09 + schrieb Ralf Lübben: > If a client connects the nas port number is locked , if a client disconnect > the port number is freed. > A new client will always get the least number of the array. > > Would this behaviour ok? Yes. That would be OK. > How many

[Openvpn-devel] Re: LZO 2.00 released--compatibility patch attached

2005-05-31 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
lar...@gullik.net (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | Kelledin writes: > | | Hi all, LZO 2.00 was just released, and it has a few API changes. | | Specifically the worst-case expansion formula prescribed by LZO.FAQ | | has changed, and headers now get their own lzo/ directory. > | I also thought th

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Re: Re: Radius support (Authentification, Authorization and Accounting)

2005-05-31 Thread Ralf Lübben
Ok, I think I understand the problem. If a client send no stop packet the ip address will never be freed if the nas-port is never used again. So if a other client connects with the same nas port number, of the client which has not send the stop packet, the freeradius server will free the ip ad

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Re: Re: Radius support (Authentification, Authorization and Accounting)

2005-05-31 Thread Torge Szczepanek
Am Montag, den 30.05.2005, 19:49 + schrieb Ralf Lübben: > I have still one question about the NAS-Port attribute. At the moment the > port number is increment for every user, but never decremt. > Will this be a problem with freeradius? Must the number be in a special > range, maybe for assignm

[Openvpn-devel] Re: LZO 2.00 released--compatibility patch attached

2005-05-31 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Kelledin writes: | Hi all, LZO 2.00 was just released, and it has a few API changes. | Specifically the worst-case expansion formula prescribed by LZO.FAQ | has changed, and headers now get their own lzo/ directory. I also thought that the license changed. Isn't this the case? -- Lgb