Matthias Andree wrote:
RPM appears to, at least on Red Hat and Novell/SUSE derived machines,
support the libraries' ELF SONAME, too, which is what my former
suggestion has been about, and AFAICS, the soname is the same on all
machines, namely liblzo.so.1 (use readelf -d to figure).
Wouldn't
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Matthias Andree wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, TomWalsh wrote:
>
> > >True, but SuSE and RH/Fedora both use "lzo" and "lzo-devel" as the
> > >provider names. That seems reasonable, as prepending a "lib" to the
> > >provider names for all libraries would render most RPM .spec
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, TomWalsh wrote:
> >True, but SuSE and RH/Fedora both use "lzo" and "lzo-devel" as the
> >provider names. That seems reasonable, as prepending a "lib" to the
> >provider names for all libraries would render most RPM .spec files
> >incompatible.
> >
> >Any guidance from LSB?
>
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, TomWalsh wrote:
> James Yonan wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, TomWalsh wrote:
> >
> >
> >>James Yonan wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, TomWalsh wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> James Yonan wrote:
>
>
> >>I will let the package maintainer of liblzo1 of the pr
