ASAP, I think. As has been mentioned it's trivial to forward the port
with a firewall. I agree being able to listen on multiple ports would
be slick too.
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 22:48:31 -, James Yonan wrote:
>
> I just got a note from IANA confirming that they've assigned TCP/UDP port 1194
> to
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 01:03:35 +0100, Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote:
> Can the server support listening on two ports at the same time? This
> would make migration much easier.
It should be straightforward enough to have your firewall redirect
incoming connections from the old port to the new.
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 22:48 -, James Yonan wrote:
> I just got a note from IANA confirming that they've assigned TCP/UDP
> port 1194 to OpenVPN.
[...]
> I'd be inclined to make the change before 2.0 final is released. Any other
> opinions?
Can the server support listening on two ports at th
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 22:48:31 -, James Yonan wrote:
>
> I just got a note from IANA confirming that they've assigned TCP/UDP port 1194
> to OpenVPN.
>
> You can see the allocation here in the global list:
>
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
>
> The question, of course, is when s
I just got a note from IANA confirming that they've assigned TCP/UDP port 1194
to OpenVPN.
You can see the allocation here in the global list:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
The question, of course, is when should we switch over to using 1194 as the
default? (We're currently using
