Re: [Openvpn-devel] patch for iproute

2004-01-17 Thread Martin Hejl
Hi James, Thanks for the patch -- it looks good and I expect to merge it. Thanks - sounds good to me. I see that you hardwire the choice for iproute2 vs. vanilla ip route + ifconfig at build time. Do you think that makes sense, or would it be better to have an --iproute2 run time flag? Two

Re: [Openvpn-devel] patch for iproute

2004-01-17 Thread James Yonan
Martin, Thanks for the patch -- it looks good and I expect to merge it. I see that you hardwire the choice for iproute2 vs. vanilla ip route + ifconfig at build time. Do you think that makes sense, or would it be better to have an --iproute2 run time flag? James Martin Hejl said: > Hi everyb

[no subject]

2004-01-17 Thread julien . touche
for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 18:21:19 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <40096f60.8080...@lycos.com> From: Julien TOUCHE User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.