Re: [Openvpn-devel] Re: [Openvpn-users] New feature proposal: --route option

2003-09-04 Thread James Yonan
Tom Bin said: > > It's really a good idea. > I think the syntax is good enough..., > maybe you can take the metric(route cost) into consideration. That's a good idea. It looks like most IP stacks support metric, I see that Windows does too so that is good. > I would like to suggest the route

[Openvpn-devel] Re: [Openvpn-users] New feature proposal: --route option

2003-09-04 Thread Tom Bin
It's really a good idea. I think the syntax is good enough..., maybe you can take the metric(route cost) into consideration. I would like to suggest the route is added once the vpn is up and deleted when the vpn is down. Moreover, is it possible to have multiple routes added ? > I would like t

[Openvpn-devel] New feature proposal: --route option

2003-09-04 Thread James Yonan
I would like to implement a --route option that will be a proxy for the route command, similar to the way that the --ifconfig option is a proxy for the ifconfig command. The goal would be to present a kind of least-common-denominator route functionality which is basic enough to be portable across

Re: [Openvpn-devel] New feature: --ifconfig for tap devices

2003-09-04 Thread Jan Johansson
> > What I need right now in order to make the TAP version of --ifconfig work > > correctly, is the correct ifconfig command syntax for setting the IP address > > and netmask of a TAP device, on all the OSes which OpenVPN supports. I've > > already coded templates for Linux and Windows, but I stil

Re: [Openvpn-devel] New feature: --ifconfig for tap devices

2003-09-04 Thread Matthias Andree
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003, James Yonan wrote: > One of the nice things about the --ifconfig option is that it lets you set TUN > adapter endpoint addresses (i.e. the virtual IP addresses for each end of the > tunnel) in a platform independent manner -- OpenVPN then translates the > --ifconfig option to