Canceling the meeting today.
On Dec 8, 2011, at 9:28 AM, "Renuka Apte" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone have anything specific to bring up in the meeting today?
> If not, we could cancel this one.
>
> Thanks,
> Renuka.
--
Mailing list: https://launchpa
Hello,
Does anyone have anything specific to bring up in the meeting today?
If not, we could cancel this one.
Thanks,
Renuka.
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-volume
Post to : openstack-volume@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-volume
More he
Hello,
We will not be having the volume meeting next week, November 24, 2011, due to
Thanksgiving.
Thanks,
Renuka.
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-volume
Post to : openstack-volume@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-volume
More help : http
Hello,
What is the current state of "boot from volume"? Is there any documentation
about how it works, design etc. Who is the best point of contact for more
information?
Is anyone in the community currently using this feature?
Thanks,
Renuka.
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-
Hello,
Will we have the openstack volume meeting tomorrow, Thursday, at 10 am PST?
Thanks,
Renuka.
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-volume
Post to : openstack-volume@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-volume
More help : https://help.launchp
count for
node failures etc. and having a one-many model for array-SN could be overkill,
so it could be many-many.
Thanks,
Renuka.
From: Vladimir Popovski [mailto:vladi...@zadarastorage.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 11:20 AM
To: Renuka Apte; Armando Migliaccio; Reddin, Tim (Cloud Ser
Hi,
I had one question about the proposal. From what I understand, it seems to
assume that different types of storage backends (actual infrastructure which
houses the volume) will be controlled by different types of volume drivers (or
at least nodes). Is this a good assumption to make?
Instea
+renuka.apte=citrix@lists.launchpad.net] On
Behalf Of Renuka Apte
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 11:57 AM
To: John Griffith; Clay Gerrard
Cc: openstack-volume@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack-volume] nova volume - next steps
Sounds good to me.
The following topics were suggested. We
Sounds good to me.
The following topics were suggested. We could let the people interested talk
more about them, and what their plans are regarding this.
Vladimir proposed:
- Standardize capability reporting for nova-volume service
- Volume-type aware schedulers
- V
, October 12, 2011 10:37 AM
To: Vladimir Popovski
Cc: Renuka Apte; openstack-volume@lists.launchpad.net; Esker, Robert;
vishvana...@gmail.com; cth...@racklabs.com; tim.red...@hp.com; w...@mpstor.com;
Ewan Mellor; Holl, Jim; clay.gerr...@rackspace.com
Subject: Re: nova volume - next steps
On 10/12
10 matches
Mail list logo
