On 09/07/2012 08:13 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
> DW> We also have a different problem with running tests in parallel
> DW> now. None of the newly designed basic/advanced ops test can be run
> DW> in parallel given their dependency between tests. The only way I can
> DW> think of to proceed would be to re
Jay Pipes writes:
> On 09/07/2012 08:13 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
>>
>> Running tempest tests in parallel is definitely a good goal to
>> have. However, I believe that all the tests run in a gate are done
>> sequentially right now, correct? Seems like if we kicked off tempest at
>> the same time as t
2 matches
Mail list logo
