Hi folks
I'm definitely interesting about this topic!
>> The simple fact is that the more "negative" tests we add to Tempest's
>> test suite, the longer Tempest is taking to run, and we are getting
>> diminishing returns in terms of the benefit of each added negative test
>> compared with the add
On 06/12/2012 04:00 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 06/12/2012 02:22 PM, Daryl Walleck wrote:
Due to the large number of input fuzzing tests that have been
submitted, I've been thinking of ways to reduce the amount of code
needed to achieve this (whether we should do it or not is a totally
different dis
On 06/12/2012 02:22 PM, Daryl Walleck wrote:
Due to the large number of input fuzzing tests that have been submitted, I've
been thinking of ways to reduce the amount of code needed to achieve this
(whether we should do it or not is a totally different discussion). Rather than
have x number of
Due to the large number of input fuzzing tests that have been submitted, I've
been thinking of ways to reduce the amount of code needed to achieve this
(whether we should do it or not is a totally different discussion). Rather than
have x number of input tests for say create server, wouldn't it
4 matches
Mail list logo
