We discussed the policy on third party apis this week at the PPB meeting. We
decided to take it to the mailing list for discussion so we can get to some
reasonable things to vote on in next weeks meeting.
tl; dr
How do third party apis fit in OpenStack?
Background
This was inspired by the cur
Hey Guys,
Are we having a meeting tomorrow. We haven't had one in a long time. I would
like to discuss the potential need for a policy on third party apis.
Vish
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc
Post to : openstack-poc@lists.l
+1
On Jun 3, 2011, at 12:28 PM, Jonathan Bryce wrote:
> In yesterday's PPB meeting we discussed the meeting schedule. It sounded like
> most people preferred to keep it scheduled on a weekly basis and just
> continue skipping it when we didn't have any business to discuss. However,
> there was
+1 (or an afternoon...)
On May 26, 2011, at 5:33 AM, Soren Hansen wrote:
> 2011/5/25 Jonathan Bryce :
>> Hi all,
>> I won't be able to make the policy board meeting tomorrow. Ewan will not
>> either. There have been no new agenda items added to the wiki page so I
>> propose we skip this week and r
ah right, silly me. Yes directly after the os meeting.
Vish
On May 9, 2011, at 8:31 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya
> wrote:
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> We discussed the importance of bringing the project into greater alignment
>
Hey guys,
We discussed the importance of bringing the project into greater alignment in
the PPB today, and we decided that the best plan was for the PTLs to have a
meeting to come up with a plan for lining up as much as we can between the
projects and to provide a base for new projects. We too
Did anyone write up what was discussed at the last meeting? I think it would
be good to post an update of what was discussed.
Also, is someone drafting up an offical core-project application. I can't
remember if a specific person volunteered to take that on.
I've updated the agenda and meetin
+1
On Apr 15, 2011, at 3:20 PM, Jonathan Bryce wrote:
> Earlier is fine with me if that makes it easier for others.
>
> Does 1900 UTC/2:00 PM CDT Monday work as a new time for everyone?
>
> Jonathan.
>
>
> On Apr 14, 2011, at 8:00 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>
>> Soren Hansen wrote:
>>> Not su
Ouch, yeah that is a bad time for Soren.
New point for the agenda. We have stuff that needs to go into
openstack-common, and we don't really have a PTL for stuff there. Who manages
this? Authn should be openstack-common for sure.
Vish
On Apr 13, 2011, at 12:08 PM, Soren Hansen wrote:
> Not
Friday, same bat time, same bat channel, is good for me.
On Apr 13, 2011, at 9:42 AM, Eric Day wrote:
> I'm mostly unavailable Thursday as well (at conference), so anytime
> Friday would be better for me too.
>
> -Eric
>
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 09:49:40AM -0500, Jonathan Bryce wrote:
>> Ewa
Fine with me.
On Jan 20, 2011, at 12:19 PM, Jonathan Bryce wrote:
> I want to schedule a regular, recurring meeting for us to get together in
> real-time and discuss any outstanding issues, general project status and
> direction, etc. We can continue to consider individual items over email, but
+1 (officially)
On Jan 17, 2011, at 7:42 AM, Jonathan Bryce wrote:
> We have a proposal to take under consideration on the process for adding
> developers to the core group for sub-projects. The full proposal can be read
> here on the wiki:
>
> http://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/Proposed/Core
This seems fine to me if we assume that the powers and responsibility of a core
dev is approving code for merge into trunk. I think as the project grows, it
might be useful to include more a linux-style hierarchy where there are core
maintainers of different sections of the code. This could ea
13 matches
Mail list logo
