Guys, I suggest we turn down the heat and rhetoric on this. We all are working
to make OpenStack great, and need to work through our internal
issues/disagreements in concise and professional manners.
Prior to anyone doing anything regarding projects moving to GitHub, let's get a
plan on the tab
2011/6/7 Chuck Thier :
> It saddens me that this is what OpenStack is becoming.
Me too.
> There is no reason that the swift team couldn't right now just fork to
> github, and leave the pieces for you to figure out.
Except we're supposed to be part of the same project. This implies
*some* amount
Chuck Thier wrote:
> It saddens me that this is what OpenStack is becoming. There is no
> reason that the swift team couldn't right now just fork to github, and
> leave the pieces for you to figure out. Instead, they are trying to do
> the right thing, work within the system and get things done i
It saddens me that this is what OpenStack is becoming. There is no reason
that the swift team couldn't right now just fork to github, and leave the
pieces for you to figure out. Instead, they are trying to do the right
thing, work within the system and get things done in a way that will work
for
John Dickinson wrote:
> I really don't think the PPB should vote to allow a project to manage its
> code in a different was. That decision should be made by the project's
> respective devs and its PTL.
> [...]
I think it boils down to "what does it mean to be an OpenStack core
project".
On one
On Jun 7, 2011, at 5:31 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>
> Like Eric said, in order to make sure we're not changing only for a
> vocal minority, the PPB needs to vote. We don't want to set a precedent
> for vocal proponents of the next cool thing to force us to change again
> in 6 months.
> ...snip.
Ewan Mellor wrote:
> So by the sounds of it, definitely not for Diablo? That means September at
> the earliest. That's fine by me -- I just need to know one way or another.
I wouldn't say that... We can certainly change between milestones, as
long as it's before diablo-3 (end of July). I'd like
John Dickinson wrote:
> On Jun 6, 2011, at 2:17 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>> The idea is to come up with a clear cost/benefit analysis and present it
>> to the PPB which will estimate if the benefit outweighs the cost for the
>> project.
>>
>> We already know from the design summit that developers
8 matches
Mail list logo
