Re: [Openstack-operators] nova-neutron with vsphere

2015-09-28 Thread Miko Bello
Thanks all for your contribution on my request. I already knew VIO ( previous version 1.0 ) but i just wanted to see what I could (or could not) do without NSX . Miko ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org

[Openstack-operators] [ceilometer] OpenStack Telemetry user survey

2015-09-28 Thread gord chung
Hello, The OpenStack Telemetry (aka Ceilometer) team would like to collect feedback and information from its user base in order to drive future improvements to the project. To do so, we have developed a survey. It should take about 15min to complete. Questions are fairly technical, so please

Re: [Openstack-operators] [ceilometer] OpenStack Telemetry user survey

2015-09-28 Thread Tim Bell
There seems to be a lot of overlap with the user survey which has just finished. Feel free to get in touch on the user-commit...@lists.openstack.org if you have questions to suggest to the survey or would like specific queries to be run on the anonymised data. There is a significant risk of ov

Re: [Openstack-operators] Milti-site Keystone & Galera

2015-09-28 Thread Curtis
Hi, For organizations with the keystone database shared across regions via galera, do you just have keystone (and perhaps glance as was suggested) in its own cluster that is multi-region, and the other databases in a cluster that is only in one region (ie. just local their their region)? Or are yo

Re: [Openstack-operators] Milti-site Keystone & Galera

2015-09-28 Thread Matt Fischer
Yes. We have a separate DB cluster for global stuff like Keystone & Designate, and a regional cluster for things like nova/neutron etc. On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Curtis wrote: > Hi, > > For organizations with the keystone database shared across regions via > galera, do you just have keys

Re: [Openstack-operators] Milti-site Keystone & Galera

2015-09-28 Thread Tim Bell
CERN do the same…. The memcache functions on keystone are very useful for scaling it up. Tim From: Matt Fischer [mailto:m...@mattfischer.com] Sent: 28 September 2015 18:51 To: Curtis Cc: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org; Jonathan Proulx Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Milti-s

Re: [Openstack-operators] Milti-site Keystone & Galera

2015-09-28 Thread Federico Michele Facca
considering that across dc, latency increase, and that latency may cause brain splits easily in high read/write, data of other services that are not global should never be replicated on multisite using a synch approach (asynch one for disaster recovery, may be good enough!) Indeed, as Tim said, on

Re: [Openstack-operators] Milti-site Keystone & Galera

2015-09-28 Thread Jay Pipes
On 09/28/2015 12:51 PM, Matt Fischer wrote: Yes. We have a separate DB cluster for global stuff like Keystone & Designate, and a regional cluster for things like nova/neutron etc. Yep, this ^ -jay ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-opera

Re: [Openstack-operators] [ceilometer] OpenStack Telemetry user survey

2015-09-28 Thread gord chung
hi Tim, it's not our intention to over-survey the community -- i apologise if this is your takeaway. the user survey that just finished was aimed to gather information regarding general OpenStack practices (one question being assigned to each project). the idea here is to have a dialogue bet

[Openstack-operators] [openstack-operators][osops] First contribution

2015-09-28 Thread JJ Asghar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hey everyone! I wanted to point out that we have had our first official contribution to OSOps today. [1][2] comes from David Wahlstrom, and I want to personally thank him for this. For the time being we are just looking for contributions, so if yo

Re: [Openstack-operators] [ceilometer] OpenStack Telemetry user survey

2015-09-28 Thread Tim Bell
I have started a thread on user-commit...@lists.openstack.org so we can try to find the right balance between ensuring the surveys are completed and meeting the needs for more detailed information for the projects. Tim > -Original Message- > From: gord chung [mailto:g...@live.ca] > Sent:

Re: [Openstack-operators] "Master" keystone and "sub" keystone

2015-09-28 Thread Adam Young
On 09/26/2015 11:19 PM, RunnerCheng wrote: Hi All, I'm a newbie of keystone, and I'm doing some research about it recently. I have a question about how to deploy it. The scenario is on below: One comany has one headquarter dc and 5 sub dc locate in different cities. We want to deploy separat

Re: [Openstack-operators] "Master" keystone and "sub" keystone

2015-09-28 Thread Jonathan Proulx
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 03:31:54PM -0400, Adam Young wrote: :On 09/26/2015 11:19 PM, RunnerCheng wrote: :>Hi All, :>I'm a newbie of keystone, and I'm doing some research about it :>recently. I have a question about how to deploy it. The scenario is :>on below: :> :>One comany has one headquarter dc

Re: [Openstack-operators] "Master" keystone and "sub" keystone

2015-09-28 Thread Matt Fischer
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Jonathan Proulx wrote: > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 03:31:54PM -0400, Adam Young wrote: > :On 09/26/2015 11:19 PM, RunnerCheng wrote: > :>Hi All, > :>I'm a newbie of keystone, and I'm doing some research about it > :>recently. I have a question about how to deploy it

Re: [Openstack-operators] "Master" keystone and "sub" keystone

2015-09-28 Thread Jonathan Proulx
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 02:06:00PM -0600, Matt Fischer wrote: :On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Jonathan Proulx wrote: :> I'm hearing conflicting advice about the suitibility of Fernet tokens :> for production use. :> :> I like the idea. I did get them to work in kilo trivially for CLI, but :> Ho

[Openstack-operators] Kilo NFV Performance Optimization advices on compute nodes

2015-09-28 Thread Pedro Sousa
Hi all, I'm trying to deploy some nfv apps on my Openstack deployment, however I'm having some performance issues in my VMs, that start to lose UDP packets at a specific packet transmission rate. Here's what I've tried and found so far: - VMs Centos 7.1 with 10GBe Neutron SR-IOV nics - Configur

Re: [Openstack-operators] Milti-site Keystone & Galera

2015-09-28 Thread Curtis
OK thanks for the input everyone, much appreciated. Thanks, Curtis. On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 09/28/2015 12:51 PM, Matt Fischer wrote: >> >> Yes. We have a separate DB cluster for global stuff like Keystone & >> Designate, and a regional cluster for things like nova

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-operators][osops] First contribution

2015-09-28 Thread David Wahlstrom
Thanks for the warm invite. Hopefully my experience at Dreamhost/DreamCompute will provide useful to this team! On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:32 AM, JJ Asghar wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Hey everyone! > > I wanted to point out that we have had our first officia

Re: [Openstack-operators] Live snapshots on the raw disks never ends

2015-09-28 Thread David Wahlstrom
George, What is your storage backend using (Gluster/ceph/local disk/etc)? Some of the distributed backend drivers have bugs in them or mask the real issue (such as watchers on objects). On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Kris G. Lindgren wrote: > I believe I was talking to Josh Harlow (he's harl

[Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [cinder] [all] The future of Cinder API v1

2015-09-28 Thread Ivan Kolodyazhny
Hi all, As you may know, we've got 2 APIs in Cinder: v1 and v2. Cinder v2 API was introduced in Grizzly and v1 API is deprecated since Juno. After [1] is merged, Cinder API v1 is disabled in gates by default. We've got a filed bug [2] to remove Cinder v1 API at all. According to Deprecation Pol

Re: [Openstack-operators] [ceilometer] OpenStack Telemetry user survey

2015-09-28 Thread Kruithof, Piet
Hi Tim, Thanks for addressing some of the potential challenges around conducting surveys on behalf of the community. The research conducted by the OpenStack UX project, including surveys, tend to focus on specific project needs rather than the overall direction of the industry, which is captured

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [cinder] [all] The future of Cinder API v1

2015-09-28 Thread Matt Fischer
Yes, people are probably still using it. Last time I tried to use V2 it didn't work because the clients were broken, and then it went back on the bottom of my to do list. Is this mess fixed? http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2015-February/006366.html On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [cinder] [all] The future of Cinder API v1

2015-09-28 Thread Sam Morrison
Yeah we’re still using v1 as the clients that are packaged with most distros don’t support v2 easily. Eg. with Ubuntu Trusty they have version 1.1.1, I just updated our “volume” endpoint to point to v2 (we have a volumev2 endpoint too) and the client breaks. $ cinder list ERROR: OpenStack Block

Re: [Openstack-operators] Live snapshots on the raw disks never ends

2015-09-28 Thread Joshua Harlow
Ours was local-disk, I believe https://review.openstack.org/#/c/208078/ (and/or its followup bug/fix) will hopefully help address this. It might not be the same issue though (but maybe it is). -Josh Kris G. Lindgren wrote: I believe I was talking to Josh Harlow (he's harlowja in #openstack-

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [cinder] [all] The future of Cinder API v1

2015-09-28 Thread Mark Voelker
FWIW, the most popular client libraries in the last user survey[1] other than OpenStack’s own clients were: libcloud (48 respondents), jClouds (36 respondents), Fog (34 respondents), php-opencloud (21 respondents), DeltaCloud (which has been retired by Apache and hasn’t seen a commit in two year

[Openstack-operators] [neutron] [nova] Nova Network/Neutron Migration Survey - need response from folks currently using Nova Networks in their deployments

2015-09-28 Thread Kruithof, Piet
There has been a significant response to the Nova Network/Neutron migration survey. However, the responses are leaning heavily on the side of deployments currently using Neutron. As a result, we would like to have more representation from folks currently using Nova Networks. If you are curren

Re: [Openstack-operators] "Master" keystone and "sub"

2015-09-28 Thread RunnerCheng
t; > Sam Cheng > > > ___ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scru

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Large Deployments Team][Tags] Ops Tag for "Scale"

2015-09-28 Thread Shamail Tahir
Thanks for the additional data-points on the granularity that we might need to address scale (component rather than project level) along with additional clarification on drivers (scale equivalent to resource being available versus needing additional resources). As mentioned earlier, deployment opt