Re: [Openstack-operators] Neutron DVR HA

2014-12-30 Thread Assaf Muller
- Original Message - > Hi Britt, > > some update on this after running tcpdump: > > I have keepalived master running on controller01, If I reboot this server it > failovers to controller02 which now becomes Keepalived Master, then I see > ping packets arriving to controller02, this is g

Re: [Openstack-operators] Neutron DVR HA

2014-12-30 Thread Assaf Muller
Sorry I can't open zip files on this email. You need l2pop to not exist in the ML2 mechanism drivers list in neutron.conf where the Neutron server is, and you need l2population = False in each OVS agent. - Original Message - > > [Text File:warning1.txt] > > Hi Asaf, > > I think I disabl

Re: [Openstack-operators] Neutron DVR HA

2014-12-30 Thread Pedro Sousa
Hi Assaf, According your instructions I can confirm that I have l2pop disabled. Meanwhile, I've made another test, yesterday when I left the office this wasn't working, but when I arrived this morning it was pinging again, and I didn't changed or touched anything. So my interpretation that this h

Re: [Openstack-operators] Fostering OpenStack Users

2014-12-30 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Hello James, On 12/30/2014 02:27 AM, James Dempsey wrote: > So, back to my original question: > > What information do you give new users to help them be effective in the > cloud? What is your go-to demo for people who don't quite understand > what OpenStack is offering? How do you reach out to

Re: [Openstack-operators] Neutron DVR HA

2014-12-30 Thread Pedro Sousa
Hi Assaf, another update, if I ping the floating ip from my instance it works. If I ping from outside/provider network, from my pc, it doesn't. Thanks On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Pedro Sousa wrote: > Hi Assaf, > > According your instructions I can confirm that I have l2pop disabled. > >

Re: [Openstack-operators] Fostering OpenStack Users

2014-12-30 Thread matt
There are several fundamental problems in getting your feet wet in OpenStack. First is that OpenStack is expecting to be installed into a rack of systems, not one system. While there are work arounds such as devstack, they fail to accurately produce a production environment or even a useful facsi

Re: [Openstack-operators] Fostering OpenStack Users

2014-12-30 Thread Jay Pipes
On 12/30/2014 10:40 AM, matt wrote: I think there was a view early on that distributions of openstack would emerge. This has not been the case. The market has spoken and it has rebuked this idea. Which market are you referring to? RDO, Mirantis OpenStack, and Ubuntu Cloud Archive are all pop

Re: [Openstack-operators] Fostering OpenStack Users

2014-12-30 Thread matt
we're all entitled to our opinions =P I wouldn't classify ubuntu cloud archive as a distro. On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 12/30/2014 10:40 AM, matt wrote: > >> I think there was a view early on that distributions of openstack would >> emerge. This has not been the cas

Re: [Openstack-operators] Fostering OpenStack Users

2014-12-30 Thread Stuart Fox
Hi James Great question and some good answers so far although I think they done go far enough. They have (mostly) focused on other operators who, while a very important part of any cloud, are not the primary audience. Think more about the end users: devs, qa, marketing, data dudes etc etc. Focus

Re: [Openstack-operators] Fostering OpenStack Users

2014-12-30 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On 12/30/2014 09:10 PM, matt wrote: > There are several fundamental problems in getting your feet wet in > OpenStack. > > First is that OpenStack is expecting to be installed into a rack of > systems, not one system. While there are work arounds such as devstack, > they fail to accurately produc

Re: [Openstack-operators] Neutron DVR HA

2014-12-30 Thread Pedro Sousa
Hi, as I stated, if I ping from an openstack instance the request appears on *Compute01* and is *OK*: *18:50:38.721115 IP 10.0.30.23 > 172.16.28.32 : ICMP echo request, id 29956, seq 36, length 64* *18:50:38.721304 IP 172.16.28.32 > 10.0.30.23 : ICMP echo r

Re: [Openstack-operators] Fostering OpenStack Users

2014-12-30 Thread Tim Bell
> -Original Message- > From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com] > Sent: 30 December 2014 16:52 > To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Fostering OpenStack Users > > On 12/30/2014 10:40 AM, matt wrote: > > I think there was a view early on that

Re: [Openstack-operators] Fostering OpenStack Users

2014-12-30 Thread James Dempsey
On 31/12/14 04:40, matt wrote: > There are several fundamental problems in getting your feet wet in > OpenStack. > > First is that OpenStack is expecting to be installed into a rack of > systems, not one system. While there are work arounds such as devstack, > they fail to accurately produce a pr

Re: [Openstack-operators] Fostering OpenStack Users

2014-12-30 Thread James Dempsey
On 31/12/14 05:09, Stuart Fox wrote: > Hi James > > Great question and some good answers so far although I think they done > go far enough. > They have (mostly) focused on other operators who, while a very > important part of any cloud, are not the primary audience. > Think more about the end user

Re: [Openstack-operators] Fostering OpenStack Users

2014-12-30 Thread matt
It might be good to setup some sort of collaborative set of reference architectures for some basic examples of OpenStack in different areas. On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 4:18 PM, James Dempsey wrote: > On 31/12/14 05:09, Stuart Fox wrote: > > Hi James > > > > Great question and some good answers so f