On 18 Aug 2016, at 22:48, Michael Still
mailto:mi...@stillhq.com>> wrote:
Shelved instances still consume IPs and hypervisor disk IIRC, so they're not
free for nova. So, there has to be some form of accounting of shelved instances
to stop resource exhaustion, especially in the IP space.
I'm n
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:43 PM, David Medberry
wrote:
> Shelve completely dissociates from a node.
and when you unshelve it goes to a node (likely a new node but potentially
the same one). The scheduling algorithm runs as if the instance had never
been on the node. There does seem to be some r
;
> GoDaddy
>
>
>
> *From: *David Medberry
> *Date: *Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 3:49 PM
> *To: *"Jonathan D. Proulx"
> *Cc: *"openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org" <
> openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [Openstack-operat
a new node?
___
Kris Lindgren
Senior Linux Systems Engineer
GoDaddy
From: David Medberry
Date: Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 3:49 PM
To: "Jonathan D. Proulx"
Cc: "openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org"
Sub
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Jonathan D. Proulx
wrote:
>
> True they do consume IPs.
>
> In my configuration they do not consume any hypervisor disk. I
> *think* this is true of all configurations once the 'shelved' systems
> are 'offloaded'.
i concur, that's the intent of shelving as I un
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 06:48:12AM +1000, Michael Still wrote:
:Shelved instances still consume IPs and hypervisor disk IIRC, so they're
:not free for nova. So, there has to be some form of accounting of shelved
:instances to stop resource exhaustion, especially in the IP space.
:
:I'm not opposed
Shelved instances still consume IPs and hypervisor disk IIRC, so they're
not free for nova. So, there has to be some form of accounting of shelved
instances to stop resource exhaustion, especially in the IP space.
I'm not opposed to removing most of their cost from quota, but I don't
think we can
+1
From: Tim Bell [tim.b...@cern.ch]
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 10:50 AM
To: Jonathan D. Proulx
Cc: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Shelving
I was interested to establish a consensus that
- Shelved instances
I was interested to establish a consensus that
- Shelved instances should not be part of the users quota
- Quota in Glance (and associated chargeback if appropriate) is needed
Glance space for us is much less expensive than people leaving their instances
running. Equally, terminating a user’s in
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 03:24:28PM +, Tim Bell wrote:
:
:We’re having a look at VM shelving for the CERN community and struggling to
find a motivation for a private cloud user to shelve their instances (and free
up resources they may be only using infrequently).
:
:The problem is that shelved
10 matches
Mail list logo