Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for AUS Ops@Summit

2016-04-17 Thread Tom Fifield
Entirely possible ... if we can find a slot that has fewer conflicts than these two ;) Suggestions, anyone? On 15/04/16 19:37, darren chan wrote: Hi Tom, Thanks for organizing the schedule. Is possible to move the Ops: Docs or the Ops: Liberty upgrade session to a different timeslot ? I know

Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for AUS Ops@Summit

2016-04-15 Thread Melvin Hillsman
Hey Tom, I can moderate the Mitaka: Beyond the Release Notes session if it is really needed and no one else has signed up to moderate. -- Melvin Hillsman Rackspace | OpenStack Innovation Center Ops Team Tech Lead Web: http://mrhillsman.com Email: mrhills...@gmail.com Office: (210) 312-1267 Mobi

Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for AUS Ops@Summit

2016-04-15 Thread darren chan
Hi Tom, Thanks for organizing the schedule. Is possible to move the Ops: Docs or the Ops: Liberty upgrade session to a different timeslot ? I know a few people who would like to attend both sessions.  Thanks!  On Wednesday, 13 April 2016, 22:40, Tom Fifield wrote: All, just a quick not

Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for AUS Ops@Summit

2016-04-14 Thread Tom Fifield
Hi all, We still have no moderators for the following sessions: * Mitaka: Beyond the Release Notes * Swift Ops Information about what it means to be a moderator is available here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Operations/Meetups#Moderators_Guide If no moderators sign up to lead these sessi

Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for AUS Ops@Summit

2016-04-13 Thread Tom Fifield
All, just a quick note to say this is now on the official agenda: https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/summit-schedule/#event_types=13,14,15 Don't forget to download your summit app - it has caching magic. Regards, Tom On 08/04/16 12:32, Tom Fifield wrote: OK, we've had moderator

Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for AUS Ops@Summit

2016-04-08 Thread Matt Jarvis
rom: Tom Fifield > Date: Thursday, April 7, 2016 at 9:32 PM > To: "openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org" < > openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org> > Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for AUS Ops@Summit > > OK, we've had moderator confirmation

Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for AUS Ops@Summit

2016-04-04 Thread Tom Fifield
Thanks to those who got back to me yesterday about conflicts. Today's update is a significant re-wrangling, so check it out below. I've started matching up moderators to slots based on your sign-ups on the etherpads - check your email :) The sessions in Red (general sessions) don't have a mod

Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for AUS Ops@Summit

2016-04-04 Thread Jonathan D. Proulx
the Scientific WG Ops Tags Team conflict hurts me, but I suspect any arrangement is going to hurt someone. will take a deeper look later but that's what jumps out at first glance. -Jon On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 12:11:48PM +0800, Tom Fifield wrote: :Hi all, : :I've taken the suggestions from the