Re: [Openstack-operators] [ceilometer] OpenStack Telemetry user survey

2015-09-28 Thread Kruithof, Piet
t: 28 September 2015 20:31 >> To: Tim Bell ; openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org >> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [ceilometer] OpenStack Telemetry user >> survey >> >> hi Tim, >> >> it's not our intention to over-survey the community

Re: [Openstack-operators] [ceilometer] OpenStack Telemetry user survey

2015-09-28 Thread Tim Bell
> Sent: 28 September 2015 20:31 > To: Tim Bell ; openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [ceilometer] OpenStack Telemetry user > survey > > hi Tim, > > it's not our intention to over-survey the community -- i apologise if this is &g

Re: [Openstack-operators] [ceilometer] OpenStack Telemetry user survey

2015-09-28 Thread gord chung
hi Tim, it's not our intention to over-survey the community -- i apologise if this is your takeaway. the user survey that just finished was aimed to gather information regarding general OpenStack practices (one question being assigned to each project). the idea here is to have a dialogue bet

Re: [Openstack-operators] [ceilometer] OpenStack Telemetry user survey

2015-09-28 Thread Tim Bell
There seems to be a lot of overlap with the user survey which has just finished. Feel free to get in touch on the user-commit...@lists.openstack.org if you have questions to suggest to the survey or would like specific queries to be run on the anonymised data. There is a significant risk of ov