Re: [Openstack-operators] newton heat stack glance error

2017-04-01 Thread Brian Rosmaita
On 4/1/17 2:16 PM, Ignazio Cassano wrote: > Tested configuration in the cluster. Heat now works as expexted. > Registry_host address must be the host address not the cluster vip. > Regards > Ignazio Glad you got it working! cheers, brian ___ OpenStack

Re: [Openstack-operators] newton heat stack glance error

2017-04-01 Thread Ignazio Cassano
Tested configuration in the cluster. Heat now works as expexted. Registry_host address must be the host address not the cluster vip. Regards Ignazio Il 01/Apr/2017 16:40, "Ignazio Cassano" ha scritto: > Hi again, I hope the configuration in previous message will work when I > 'll enable the cl

Re: [Openstack-operators] newton heat stack glance error

2017-04-01 Thread Ignazio Cassano
Hi again, I hope the configuration in previous message will work when I 'll enable the cluster. I am going to test it. Many thanks for your help. Ignazio Il 01/Apr/2017 15:22, "Ignazio Cassano" ha scritto: > Hi Brian, > I found where is the problem > In glance-api.conf I must setup the registry_

Re: [Openstack-operators] newton heat stack glance error

2017-04-01 Thread Ignazio Cassano
Hi Brian, when I enable v1 and v2 api in glance-api.conf , using the same heat template I got http 500. Now in my glance-api.conf I have the same configuration used on ubuntu 16 (whete heat works fine): #enable_v1_api = false #enable_v1_registry = true #enable_v2_api = true #enable_v2_registry = tr

Re: [Openstack-operators] newton heat stack glance error

2017-04-01 Thread Ignazio Cassano
Hi Brian, I found where is the problem In glance-api.conf I must setup the registry_host entry and it must be equal to the bind_host entry in the file glance-registry.conf. So, enable v1 api and the abive parameters, heat works. My problem is that I am using 3 controllers and the bind_host in the

Re: [Openstack-operators] newton heat stack glance error

2017-04-01 Thread Brian Rosmaita
Hello Ignazio. A few things: (1) You can run both glance v1 and v2 simultaneously. They share the same database and storage backend. The difference is that you, as a client, interact with the APIs in different ways (v1 does a lot of info-passing in http headers, v2 does everything in JSON; v2 h

Re: [Openstack-operators] newton heat stack glance error

2017-03-31 Thread Ignazio Cassano
I've just tried to disableglance v2 api and load a new image cirros2, but If I show it: Field| Value| +--+--+ | checksum | ee1eca47dc88f4879d8a229cc70a07c6

Re: [Openstack-operators] newton heat stack glance error

2017-03-31 Thread Ignazio Cassano
Hi Brian, looking at glance api log, I can see heat search images under /v1 uri on centos. If I disable glance v2 api , do you think I must reload images to change their uri ? Thanks 2017-03-31 21:07 GMT+02:00 Brian Rosmaita : > On 3/31/17 10:52 AM, Ignazio Cassano wrote: > > Hi all, > > I just i

Re: [Openstack-operators] newton heat stack glance error

2017-03-31 Thread Brian Rosmaita
On 3/31/17 10:52 AM, Ignazio Cassano wrote: > Hi all, > I just installed openstack newton on centos 7 and enabled glance with v2 > api. > When I execute a simple heat stack, it returns the following error: > > ERROR: Property error: : resources.my_instance.properties.image: : > HTTPMultipleChoices

[Openstack-operators] newton heat stack glance error

2017-03-31 Thread Ignazio Cassano
Hi all, I just installed openstack newton on centos 7 and enabled glance with v2 api. When I execute a simple heat stack, it returns the following error: ERROR: Property error: : resources.my_instance.properties.image: : HTTPMultipleChoices (HTTP 300) Requested version of OpenStack Images API is n