Re: [Openstack-operators] Taking Scientific WG Ops Meetup Feedback back to Ceilometer

2016-03-02 Thread Tim Bell
We’re starting to have a look at gnocchi in order to address the large storage volumes. We plan on using the Ceph backend for storage. One part of the documentation set that we were missing was a guide to how to migrate from ceilometer to a ceilometer/gnocchi combination (which I understand is

Re: [Openstack-operators] Taking Scientific WG Ops Meetup Feedback back to Ceilometer

2016-03-01 Thread Edgar Magana
Thanks a lot for helping on this Anita! Cheers, Edgar On 3/1/16, 9:43 AM, "Anita Kuno" wrote: >While I attended the Scientific WG session at the Ops Meetup in >Manchester I took an action item to take operator feedback back to >ceilometer. > >Here is the etherpad for the Scientific WG sessi

[Openstack-operators] Taking Scientific WG Ops Meetup Feedback back to Ceilometer

2016-03-01 Thread Anita Kuno
While I attended the Scientific WG session at the Ops Meetup in Manchester I took an action item to take operator feedback back to ceilometer. Here is the etherpad for the Scientific WG session: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MAN-ops-Scientific-WG Here is the link to the irc channel where I had