Stang
Cc: Matt Jarvis; OpenStack Operators
Betreff: Re: [Openstack-operators] Shared Storage for compute nodes
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:42:45AM +0200, Michael Stang wrote:
:I think I have asked my question not correctly, it is not for the cinder
:backend, I meant the shared storage for the
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:42:45AM +0200, Michael Stang wrote:
:I think I have asked my question not correctly, it is not for the cinder
:backend, I meant the shared storage for the instances which is shared by the
:compute nodes. Or can cinder also be used for this? Sorry if I ask stupid
:question
Hello Saverio,
many thanks, I will have a look :-)
Regards,
Michael
> Saverio Proto hat am 21. Juni 2016 um 12:41 geschrieben:
>
> Hello Michael,
>
> have a look at Openstack Manila and CephFS
>
> Cheers
>
> Saverio
>
>
> 2016-06-21 11:42 GMT+02:00 Michael Stang mailto:michael.s
Hello Michael,
have a look at Openstack Manila and CephFS
Cheers
Saverio
2016-06-21 11:42 GMT+02:00 Michael Stang :
> I think I have asked my question not correctly, it is not for the cinder
> backend, I meant the shared storage for the instances which is shared by
> the compute nodes. Or can
I think I have asked my question not correctly, it is not for the cinder
backend, I meant the shared storage for the instances which is shared by the
compute nodes. Or can cinder also be used for this? Sorry if I ask stupid
questions, OpenStack is still new for me ;-)
Regards,
Michael
> Matt J
Hello Sampath,
no I haven't read this one yet, thank you I will go through it.
Regards,
Michael
> Sam P hat am 21. Juni 2016 um 09:55 geschrieben:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Hope you have already gone through this document... if not FYI
> http://docs.openstack.org/ops-guide/arch_storage.html
>
> As Saveri
Hello Saverio,
thank you I will have a look at these documents.
Michael
> Saverio Proto hat am 21. Juni 2016 um 09:42 geschrieben:
>
>
> Hello Michael,
>
> a very widely adopted solution is to use Ceph with rbd volumes.
>
> http://docs.openstack.org/liberty/config-reference/content/ceph-rados
If you look at the user survey (
https://www.openstack.org/user-survey/survey-2016-q1/landing ) you can see
what the current landscape looks like in terms of deployments. Ceph is by
far the most commonly used storage backend for Cinder.
On 21 June 2016 at 08:27, Michael Stang
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I
Hi,
Hope you have already gone through this document... if not FYI
http://docs.openstack.org/ops-guide/arch_storage.html
As Saverio said, Ceph is widely adopted solution.
For small clouds, we found that NFS is much affordable solution in
terms of cost and the complexity.
--- Regards,
Sampath
Hello Michael,
a very widely adopted solution is to use Ceph with rbd volumes.
http://docs.openstack.org/liberty/config-reference/content/ceph-rados.html
http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/rbd/rbd-openstack/
you find more options here under Volume drivers:
http://docs.openstack.org/liberty/config-
Hi,
I wonder what is the recommendation for a shared storage for the compute nodes?
At the moment we are using an iSCSI device which is served to all compute nodes
with multipath, the filesystem is OCFS2. But this makes it a little unflexible
in my opinion, because you have to decide how many com
11 matches
Mail list logo