Re: [Openstack-operators] New services disable reason

2015-01-15 Thread Alex Leonhardt
OpenStack > Operators > Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] New services disable reason > > Our install is still quite small and we take the risk of hitting that > compute node whilst the service is starting, but we haven't actually > encountered that yet (probably a user base s

Re: [Openstack-operators] New services disable reason

2015-01-15 Thread Michael Dorman
ck-operators@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] New services disable reason Our install is still quite small and we take the risk of hitting that compute node whilst the service is starting, but we haven't actually encountered that yet (probably a user base size i

Re: [Openstack-operators] New services disable reason

2015-01-15 Thread Alex Leonhardt
Our install is still quite small and we take the risk of hitting that compute node whilst the service is starting, but we haven't actually encountered that yet (probably a user base size issue) ... IMHO, having a reason why stuff is disabled avoids hours of confusion and trying to find the person

[Openstack-operators] New services disable reason

2015-01-14 Thread Belmiro Moreira
Hi, as operators I would like to have your comments/suggestions on: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/136645/1 With a large number of nodes several services are disabled because various reasons (in our case mainly hardware interventions). To help operations we use the "disable reason" as fast filt