Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for AUS Ops@Summit

2016-04-17 Thread Tom Fifield
Entirely possible ... if we can find a slot that has fewer conflicts than these two ;) Suggestions, anyone? On 15/04/16 19:37, darren chan wrote: Hi Tom, Thanks for organizing the schedule. Is possible to move the Ops: Docs or the Ops: Liberty upgrade session to a different timeslot ? I know

Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for AUS Ops@Summit

2016-04-15 Thread Melvin Hillsman
Hey Tom, I can moderate the Mitaka: Beyond the Release Notes session if it is really needed and no one else has signed up to moderate. -- Melvin Hillsman Rackspace | OpenStack Innovation Center Ops Team Tech Lead Web: http://mrhillsman.com Email: mrhills...@gmail.com Office: (210) 312-1267 Mobi

Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for AUS Ops@Summit

2016-04-15 Thread darren chan
Hi Tom, Thanks for organizing the schedule. Is possible to move the Ops: Docs or the Ops: Liberty upgrade session to a different timeslot ? I know a few people who would like to attend both sessions.  Thanks!  On Wednesday, 13 April 2016, 22:40, Tom Fifield wrote: All, just a quick not

Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for AUS Ops@Summit

2016-04-14 Thread Tom Fifield
Hi all, We still have no moderators for the following sessions: * Mitaka: Beyond the Release Notes * Swift Ops Information about what it means to be a moderator is available here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Operations/Meetups#Moderators_Guide If no moderators sign up to lead these sessi

Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for AUS Ops@Summit

2016-04-13 Thread Tom Fifield
All, just a quick note to say this is now on the official agenda: https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/summit-schedule/#event_types=13,14,15 Don't forget to download your summit app - it has caching magic. Regards, Tom On 08/04/16 12:32, Tom Fifield wrote: OK, we've had moderator

Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for AUS Ops@Summit

2016-04-08 Thread Matt Jarvis
rom: Tom Fifield > Date: Thursday, April 7, 2016 at 9:32 PM > To: "openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org" < > openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org> > Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for AUS Ops@Summit > > OK, we've had moderator confirmation

Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for AUS Ops@Summit

2016-04-04 Thread Tom Fifield
Thanks to those who got back to me yesterday about conflicts. Today's update is a significant re-wrangling, so check it out below. I've started matching up moderators to slots based on your sign-ups on the etherpads - check your email :) The sessions in Red (general sessions) don't have a mod

Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for AUS Ops@Summit

2016-04-04 Thread Jonathan D. Proulx
the Scientific WG Ops Tags Team conflict hurts me, but I suspect any arrangement is going to hurt someone. will take a deeper look later but that's what jumps out at first glance. -Jon On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 12:11:48PM +0800, Tom Fifield wrote: :Hi all, : :I've taken the suggestions from the

[Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for AUS Ops@Summit

2016-04-03 Thread Tom Fifield
Hi all, I've taken the suggestions from the etherpad and attempted to wrangle them into something that would fit in the space we have with as few conflicts as possible. As a reminder, we have two different kind of sessions - General Sessions, which are discussions for the operator community