[Openstack-operators] [CMDB] CMDB Vancouver Working Group

2015-05-24 Thread Joseph Bajin
Hi, I wanted to provide a recap of the CMDB working group from the Summit. There was good attendance with people that had a great amount of experience working and building a CMDB. While it may seem easy on the surface, it actually is a pretty big project with a lot of different options and theor

Re: [Openstack-operators] CMDB

2015-05-10 Thread Jaesuk Ahn
I will be very interested in this session as well. Since this is a very problem my team is facing in my company's effort to develop the next generation datacenter operation platform. We realized leveraging and automating legacy CI (configuration item) is not a trivial problem to solve. will be gla

Re: [Openstack-operators] CMDB

2015-05-10 Thread Tom Fifield
All, Many thanks for your robust discussion. It seems that there are indeed more than a few folks who can take care of this session. It's on: Wednesday 2:40 - 3:20 https://libertydesignsummit.sched.org/event/553947ceb7c1c223fa689da188abb9a9 I hope you have fun sharing your CMDB experiences and

Re: [Openstack-operators] CMDB

2015-05-07 Thread Clint Byrum
I added information about Assimilation Monitoring to the etherpad. It's not strictly a CMDB, but it can be used for what CMDB's often are used for, and is worth noting in the discussion. Excerpts from Shane Gibson's message of 2015-05-07 08:27:01 -0700: > > At Symantec we use YiDB for CMDB data -

Re: [Openstack-operators] CMDB

2015-05-07 Thread Shane Gibson
At Symantec we use YiDB for CMDB data - however - we find it to be lacking as it is NOT a GraphDB, but emulates GraphDB like behavior. In addition, it requires MongoDB as a backing store - and that will eventually corrupt and lose your data...often silently (please direct your flame mail to /d

Re: [Openstack-operators] CMDB

2015-05-06 Thread matt
The fundamental problem with a CMDB implementation as I see it, is you are effectively in need of a shared comm services for fast action small meta data sets. That becomes a project all in it's own right. -matt On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Allamaraju, Subbu wrote: > Hi Tom, > > Thanks for

Re: [Openstack-operators] CMDB

2015-05-06 Thread Allamaraju, Subbu
Hi Tom, Thanks for adding this slot. We do have a fairly full-fledged CMDB in house that keeps tracks of all our infra and apps. Unfortunately none of that team is going to be able to make it to the Summit, but I’m trying to have someone do a demo remotely and participate on EtherPad. Subbu

Re: [Openstack-operators] CMDB

2015-05-06 Thread Evan Linwood
Fifield [mailto:t...@openstack.org] Sent: Wednesday, 6 May 2015 8:04 PM To: OpenStack Operators Subject: [Openstack-operators] CMDB Hi, Is anyone interested enough in CMDB to run a working session on it at the design summit? https://libertydesignsummit.sched.org/event/553947ceb7c1c223fa68

Re: [Openstack-operators] CMDB

2015-05-06 Thread matt
HP tried to talk on this last year and was shot down. They have a CMDB API... they SHOULD open source it. On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Andrea Tartaglia wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > I'd be very interested in this too. > > -- > > Andrea > May 6 2015 3:31 PM,

Re: [Openstack-operators] CMDB

2015-05-06 Thread Andrea Tartaglia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I'd be very interested in this too. -- Andrea May 6 2015 3:31 PM, "Matt Van Winkle" wrote: > Was there discussion about this at the mid-cycle? I'd love to see if > there is any background info for context besides the entries in [1]. Is > the desir

Re: [Openstack-operators] CMDB

2015-05-06 Thread Matt Van Winkle
Was there discussion about this at the mid-cycle? I'd love to see if there is any background info for context besides the entries in [1]. Is the desire to trade best practices or start pushing for some sort of StackForge type project? I need to look at the schedule, but I might be able to help.

Re: [Openstack-operators] CMDB

2015-05-06 Thread Joseph Bajin
Hi Tom, If you don't get anyone to sign-up for it, and it doesn't conflict with the "On-Boarding" session, I'm willing to do it. I have some interest in it and curious to know what others are doing. --Joe On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:04 AM, Tom Fifield wrote: > Hi, > > Is anyone interested enough

[Openstack-operators] CMDB

2015-05-06 Thread Tom Fifield
Hi, Is anyone interested enough in CMDB to run a working session on it at the design summit? https://libertydesignsummit.sched.org/event/553947ceb7c1c223fa689da188abb9a9 It was suggested on the planning etherpad, but so far we've found no-one interested in running it. Regards, Tom _