Most likely the latter, with due respects to the code.
Most likely that VPNaaS is not required for current usage scenarios.
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 11:56 pm Edgar Magana wrote:
> I know I can’t wear both hats but in this case as Operator as one of the
> constant moderators for the neutron-related se
Allison,
Thanks for not conflicting with OpenStack Day Seattle :)
If we are still in planning stage, how about we colocate Ops meet up with
OpenStack Day Seattle? I can try getting the same venue as OpenStack Day
Seattle, which can easily accommodate 200 attendees or more.
Thanks,
Sriram.
On Mo
Dear Operators,
I am organizing OpenStack Day Seattle 2015[1], which is to be held on Aug
20 2015, co-located with LinuxCon North America [2]. CFP [3] for the event
is open for two tracks - Enterprise and Telcos.
Submissions highlighting OpenStack use cases, challenges (particularly from
Telcos)
Why do you think this is silly? When you say 'different systems inside'
what do you mean?
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Abel Lopez wrote:
> Has anyone considered doing PoC stuff on those ARM microservers?
> I like the idea of some 2 RU system with a boat load of different systems
> inside it
eady-to-go here:
>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ha-guide
>>
>> Christian did some initial clean up so it is ready to keep iterating
>> on. A meeting sounds like a great first step, thanks for starting the
>> conversation!
>> Anne
>>
>>
rt this Thursday, January 15, 2015.
>>
>> I'll do some cleanup to the pad [1] before our first meeting so hopefully
>> we can quickly arrive at owners and move forward.
>>
>> Best,
>> Matt
>>
>> [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-haguide
