Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [QA][LCOO] MEX-ops-meetup: OpenStack Extreme Testing

in > parallel (and generate more realistic load) > -. > > So it would be really nice if you can share gaps that you faced that are > blocking you to use directly Rally.. > > Thanks! > > Best regards, > Boris Pavlovic > > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:50 P

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [QA][LCOO] MEX-ops-meetup: OpenStack Extreme Testing

Failure injection: https://github.com/openstack/os-faults > > - Rally Hooks Mechanism (to inject in rally scenarios failures): > https://rally.readthedocs.io/en/latest/plugins/implementation/hook_and_trigger_plugins.html > > > > > > Best regards, > Boris Pavlovic > &g

[Openstack-operators] [QA][LCOO] MEX-ops-meetup: OpenStack Extreme Testing

Hi All, This is a follow up for OpenStack Extreme Testing session[1] we did in MEX-ops-meetup. Quick intro for those who were not there: In this work, we proposed to add new testing framework for openstack. This framework will provides tool for create tests with destructive scenarios which will c

Re: [Openstack-operators] Remote pacemaker on coHi mpute nodes

Hi, This might not what exactly you are looking for... but... you may extend this. In Masakari [0], we use pacemaker-remote in masakari-monitors[1] to monitor node failures. In [1], there is hostmonitor.sh, which will gonna deprecate in next cycle, but straightforward way to do this. [0] https

Re: [Openstack-operators] [HA] HA Discussion at Boston Forum

-HA-in-openstack Please join and let's discuss the HA issues in OpenStack... --- Regards, Sampath On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Sam P wrote: > Hi All, > > I proposed a session [1] to Boston Forum and it is now at incomplete state. > This is good opportunity for all of u

Re: [Openstack-operators] [User-committee] [Forum] Moderators needed!

Hi Arkandy, Thank you. I replied to Shamail with "I am available to moderate the session" for ​ High Availability in OpenStack . However, by mistake my reply only sent to individual member

[Openstack-operators] [HA] HA Discussion at Boston Forum

Hi All, I proposed a session [1] to Boston Forum and it is now at incomplete state. This is good opportunity for all of us to get together and discuss our HA related issues. I need your help to reform this session. Please put comments on [1] or replay to this with your comments. [1] http://fo

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-community] OpenStack Summit Boston-CFP closes February 6th

Hi Erin, Thank you for the reminder and other info. In you previous mail, > Panels are allowed a total of four speakers plus one moderator, whereas > presentations and lightning talks are limited to two speakers. To the best of my knowledge, presentations limited to three speakers. Not sure

Re: [Openstack-operators] Shared Storage for compute nodes

Hi, Hope you have already gone through this document... if not FYI http://docs.openstack.org/ops-guide/arch_storage.html As Saverio said, Ceph is widely adopted solution. For small clouds, we found that NFS is much affordable solution in terms of cost and the complexity. --- Regards, Sampath