What do you guys use to create custom dashboard for openstack? Do you use
django and python openstack sdk or modify the horizon dashboard?
Thanks
Paras.
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack
It does have the virtio drivers and the image file is qcow2 not raw. To
narrow down the issue this is what I have done.
1) Download CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud.qcow2 from centos.org. Upload to
glance and while creating a volume in cinder volume.log I see 250MB/sec
download speed. This is normal
VD installer, I'd suggest checking out
> diskimage-builder to make custom images for use on Openstack.
>
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 10:16 AM Paras pradhan
> wrote:
>
>> Also this is what I've noticed with the centos cloud image I downloaded.
>> If I add few packages
ft on
device. Any other options?
Thanks
Paras.
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Paras pradhan
wrote:
> I ran virt-sparsify. So before running virt-sparsify it was 6.0GB and
> after it is 1.3GB.
>
> Thanks
> Paras.
>
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 2:53 AM, Tomáš Vondra
> wrot
in one image is zeroed out, it
> will convert much faster. If that is the problem, use „dd if=/dev/zero
> of=temp;sync;rm temp“ or zerofree.
>
> Tomas
>
>
>
> *From:* Paras pradhan [mailto:pradhanpa...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, July 31, 2017 11:54 PM
> *To:* openstac
Hello
I have two qcow2 images uploaded to glance. One is CentOS 7 cloud image
downloaded from centos.org. The other one is custom built using CentOS
7.DVD. When I create cinder volumes from them, volume creation from the
custom built image it is very very slow.
CenOS qcow2:
2017-07-31 21:42:4
aximizing-efficiency-in-openstack-using-gnocchi-and-ceilometer
>
> []'s
> Hubner
>
> On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Paras pradhan
> wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> What kind of storage backend do you guys use if you see disk IO
>> bottlenecks when storing
Hello
What kind of storage backend do you guys use if you see disk IO bottlenecks
when storing ceilometer events and metrics? In my current configuration I
am using 300 GB 10K SAS (in hardware raid 1) and iostat report does not
look good (upto 100% unilization) with ceilometer consuming high CPU a
wrote:
> Hey Paras,
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Paras pradhan
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there any documentation or reference architecture how fuel 7 deploys
> DVR
> > and other networking components?
>
> This might be what you're looking for
Hi,
Is there any documentation or reference architecture how fuel 7 deploys DVR
and other networking components?
Thanks
Paras.
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listin
George,
My issue has been resolved. The conflict was created by the local virbr0
interface's nat rules. After removing this interface from my compute node
all looks good now.
Thanks for your help
Paras.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Paras pradhan
wrote:
> George,
>
> Disab
#x27; - means problems in routing/nat
> If 'no' - means problem are outside openstack router (external net,
> provider routing, etc).
>
>
> On 10/29/2014 06:23 PM, Paras pradhan wrote:
>
> Hi George,
>
>
> You mean .193 and .194 should be in the diffe
correction:
*You mean .193 and .194 should be in the different interfaces?
192.168.122.193/24 reserved from the allocation pool and
192.168.122.194/32 is the floating ip*
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Paras pradhan
wrote:
> Hi George,
>
>
> You mean .193 and .194 shou
is is uncleaned network node (lesser bug), or
> someone messing with neutron.
>
> Starts from neutron:
>
> show ports for router:
>
> neutron port-list --device-id=router-uuid-here
> neutron floatingips-list
> neutron net-list
> neutron subnet-list
> (trim to related
got floating inside network namespace (ip net exec
> qrouter... ip -4 a), or just bash in to it (stdbuf -e0 -o0 ip net exec
> qrouter... /bin/bash) and play with it like with normal server.
>
>
>
> On 10/24/2014 07:38 PM, Paras pradhan wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Assigned a
Hello,
Assigned a floating ip to an instance. But I can't ping the instance. This
instance can reach internet with no problem. But I can't ssh or icmp to
this instance. Its not a security group issue.
On my network node that runs l3, I can see qrouter. The extenel subnet
looks like this:
allocat
16 matches
Mail list logo
