Re: [Openstack-operators] OpenContrail Users at the BCN Summit?

2016-10-21 Thread Matthew Welch
eek. :) > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Matthew Welch wrote: >> A few of our team members will be out at the summit next week. >> Meeting up to chat would be great. >> >> - matt >> >> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Curtis wrote: >>> Hi All, >&g

Re: [Openstack-operators] OpenContrail Users at the BCN Summit?

2016-10-20 Thread Matthew Welch
A few of our team members will be out at the summit next week. Meeting up to chat would be great. - matt On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Curtis wrote: > Hi All, > > Are there any OpenContrail users that will be at the summit next week? > If so let me know because I'd like to talk to anyone who

Re: [Openstack-operators] [neutron][ml2] Gutting ML2 from Neutron - possible?

2016-04-01 Thread Matthew Welch
We are looking at contrail now and it does have some downsides to their arhitecture. Because it overrides most of the APIs it lags behind the more recent branches. In addition it assumes control over many functions that sometimes lag behind. However the compelling reason for us was the ability to u

Re: [Openstack-operators] [kolla] Question about how Operators deploy

2016-02-12 Thread Matthew Welch
I would agree with the recent comments. Being able to separate them out would be ideal. On Friday, February 12, 2016, Dan Sneddon wrote: > On 02/12/2016 06:04 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > Unfortunately I won't be able to make it to the Operator midcycle > > because of b