ocesses would have nothing
to bind to.
>
> ------
> *From:* Erik McCormick
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 24, 2018 6:18 PM
> *To:* Engelmann Florian
> *Cc:* openstack-operators
> *Subject:* Re: [Openstack-operators] [octavia][rocky] Octavia and VxLAN
&g
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018, 12:02 PM Florian Engelmann <
florian.engelm...@everyware.ch> wrote:
> Am 10/24/18 um 2:08 PM schrieb Erik McCormick:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018, 3:14 AM Florian Engelmann
> > mailto:florian.engelm...@everyware.ch>>
>
> &
c routes. The route on the other connection won't interfere
with it as it lives in a namespace.
>
> Am 10/23/18 um 6:57 PM schrieb Erik McCormick:
> > So in your other email you said asked if there was a guide for
> > deploying it with Kolla ansible...
> >
> > Oh b
some SSL errors. It passes gate though, so I aasume it must
work? I dunno.
Networking comments and a really messy kolla-ansible / octavia how-to below...
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 10:09 AM Florian Engelmann
wrote:
>
> Am 10/23/18 um 3:20 PM schrieb Erik McCormick:
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 7:53 AM Florian Engelmann
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We did test Octavia with Pike (DVR deployment) and everything was
> working right our of the box. We changed our underlay network to a
> Layer3 spine-leaf network now and did not deploy DVR as we don't wanted
> to have that much
Oops, dropped Operators. Can't wait until it's all one list...
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 10:44 AM Erik McCormick
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 4:23 AM Tobias Urdin wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've been having a lot of issues with SSL certificate
I've been wrestling with getting Octavia up and running and have
become stuck on two issues. I'm hoping someone has run into these
before. My google foo has come up empty.
Issue 1:
When the Octavia controller tries to poll the amphora instance, it
tries repeatedly and eventually fails. The error o
Hello all,
The Ops Meetup team has embarked on a mission to revive the
traditional Operators Meetup that have historically been held between
Summits. With the upcoming merger of the PTG into the Summit week, and
the merger of most Ops discussion sessions at Summits into the Forum,
we felt that we
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 5:19 AM Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Matthias and I talked this morning about this topic, and we came to
> realize
> that there's room for/would be beneficial to have a common place for:
>
> a) Documentation about second day operator tools which can be
>
Ate you getting any particular log messages that lead you to conclude your
issue lies with OVS? I've hit lots of kernel limits under those conditions
before OVS itself ever noticed. Anything in dmesg, journal or neutron logs
of interest?
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018, 7:27 PM Jean-Philippe Méthot <
jp.met.
This is a friendly reminder for anyone wishing to see Ops-focused sessions
in Berlin to get your submissions in soon. We have a couple things there
that came out of the PTG, but that's it so far. See below for details.
Cheers,
Erik
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018, 5:07 PM Erik McCormick
wrote:
&g
Hello everyone,
I have set up an etherpad to collect Ops related session ideas for the
Forum at the Berlin Summit. Please suggest any topics that you would
like to see covered, and +1 existing topics you like.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ops-forum-stein
Cheers,
Erik
___
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018, 8:40 PM Rochelle Grober
wrote:
> Sounds like an important discussion to have with the operators in Denver.
> Should put this on the schedule for the Ops meetup.
>
> --Rocky
>
We are planning to attend the upgrade sessions on Monday as a group. How
about we put it there?
-Er
a dedicated space at the PTG. You are welcome and
>
> It's 10th - 11th (Monday and Tuesday) in case someone is planning their
> travel :)
>
> Cheers.
> Shintaro
>
> On 2018/08/22 0:40, Erik McCormick wrote:
> > Hello Ops,
> >
> > As you are hopefully
Hello Ops,
As you are hopefully aware, the Ops meetup, now integrated as part of
the Project Team Gathering (PTG) is rapidly approaching. We are a bit
behind on session planning, and we need your help to create an agenda.
Please insert your session ideas into this etherpad, add subtopics to
alrea
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018, 8:59 AM Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Chris Morgan's message of 2018-07-03 07:20:42 -0400:
> > Question 1. "Are you considering attending the OpenStack Project
> Technical
> > Gathering (PTG) in Denver in September?"
> >
> > 83.33% yes
> > 16.67% no
> >
> > (24 respond
On Tue, May 29, 2018, 7:15 AM Chris Morgan wrote:
> Some of us will be only just returning to work today after being away all
> week last week for the (successful) OpenStack Summit, therefore I propose
> we skip having a meeting today but regroup next week?
>
+1
> Chris
>
> --
> Chris Morgan
Do you have enough hypervisors you can dedicate some to each purpose? You
could make two availability zones each with a different backend.
On Mon, May 21, 2018, 11:52 AM Smith, Eric wrote:
> I have 2 Ceph pools, one backed by SSDs and one backed by spinning disks
> (Separate roots within the CRU
Hello all,
There are two forum sessions in Vancouver covering Fast Forward Upgrades.
Session 1 (Current State): Wednesday May 23rd, 09:00 - 09:40, Room 220
Session 2 (Future Work): Wednesday May 23rd, 09:50 - 10:30, Room 220
The combined etherpad for both sessions can be found at:
https://etherp
Thanks! You're my heroes :)
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Amy Marrich wrote:
> Erik,
>
> Here's the Mitaka archive:)
>
> http://vault.centos.org/7.3.1611/cloud/x86_64/openstack-mitaka/
>
> Amy (spotz)
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 2:13 PM, Erik McCormi
Hi All,
Does anyone happen to have an archive of the MItaka RDO repo lying
around they'd be willing to share with a poor unfortunate soul? My
clone of it has gone AWOL and I have moderately desperate need of it.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Erik
___
OpenStack-oper
ime in SYD. I'm
just not sure how to structure it or break it down.
> Thanks,
> -Jon
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:07:34AM -0400, Erik McCormick wrote:
> :Greetings Ops,
> :
> :We are rapidly approaching the deadline for Forum session proposals
> :(This coming Sunday, 4/
Greetings Ops,
We are rapidly approaching the deadline for Forum session proposals
(This coming Sunday, 4/15) and we have been rather lax in getting the
process started from our side. I've created an etherpad here for
everyone to put up session ideas.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YYZ-forum-op
I'm a +1 too as long as the devs at large are cool with it and won't hate
on us for crashing their party. I also +1 the proposed format. It's
basically what we're discussed in Tokyo. Make it so.
Cheers
Erik
PS. Sorry for the radio silence the past couple weeks. Vacation, kids,
etc.
On Apr 2, 2
tc?
>
HAProxy can't do that alone. However, using Pacemaker just to manage a
floating IP is like using an aircraft carrier to go fishing. It's best
to use Keepalived (or similar) to do that job. It only does that one
thing, and it does it very well.
> _____
Hello all,
TL;DR - Those going to the Tokyo Ops meetup, please go volunteer to
moderate sessions and offer any last minute topic ideas at
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TYO-ops-meetup-2018
-
The spring Ops meetup in Tokyo is rapidly approaching. Details on the
event can be found here:
htt
It was moved to 10am EST die to lots of conflicts. Need to update the wiki.
On Feb 6, 2018 9:11 AM, "Jimmy McArthur" wrote:
> Was it canceled?
>
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Ops_Meetups_Team
>
> ___
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-
Planning for the Spring Ops Meetup in Tokyo (March 6 and 7) continues
to come together nicely. If you plan to join us, please go sign up at:
https://goo.gl/HBJkPy
Also, please help us to fill out the agenda by suggesting topics or
adding a +1 to the ones you like at:
https://etherpad.openstack.org
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Rochelle Grober
wrote:
> Folks,
>
> This discussion and the people interested in it seem like a perfect
> application of the SIG process. By turning LTS into a SIG, everyone can
> discuss the issues on the SIG mailing list and the discussion shouldn't end
> up
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 6:44 PM, John Dickinson wrote:
>
>
> On 14 Nov 2017, at 15:18, Mathieu Gagné wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
>>> The pressure for #2 comes from the inability to skip upgrades and the fact
>>> that upgrades are hugely time consuming still.
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Blair Bethwaite
wrote:
> Hi all - please note this conversation has been split variously across
> -dev and -operators.
>
> One small observation from the discussion so far is that it seems as
> though there are two issues being discussed under the one banner:
> 1)
On Nov 8, 2017 1:52 PM, "James E. Blair" wrote:
Erik McCormick writes:
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 6:45 PM, James E. Blair
wrote:
>> Erik McCormick writes:
>>
>>> The concept, in general, is to create a new set of cores from these
>>> groups, and use
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 6:45 PM, James E. Blair wrote:
> Erik McCormick writes:
>
>> The concept, in general, is to create a new set of cores from these
>> groups, and use 3rd party CI to validate patches. There are lots of
>> details to be worked out yet, but our amazing
Hello Ops folks,
This morning at the Sydney Summit we had a very well attended and very
productive session about how to go about keeping a selection of past
releases available and maintained for a longer period of time (LTS).
There was agreement in the room that this could be accomplished by
movi
use as a starting point. Thanks to everyone for
participating!
Cheers,
Erik
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:25 PM, wrote:
> See you there Eric.
>
>
>
> From: Erik McCormick [mailto:emccorm...@cirrusseven.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 10:58 AM
> To: Matt Riedemann
> C
On Oct 30, 2017 11:53 AM, "Matt Riedemann" wrote:
On 9/20/2017 9:42 AM, arkady.kanev...@dell.com wrote:
> Lee,
> I can chair meeting in Sydney.
> Thanks,
> Arkady
>
Arkady,
Are you actually moderating the forum session in Sydney because the session
says Eric McCormick is the session moderator:
Tom,
Thank you for all you've done herding cats around here. We wouldn't be
where we are today without you. We better find a very large pub in
Sydney. See you there!
All the best on your future sunbathing endeavors :)
Cheers,
Erik
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
> Hi all,
>
The current release of Magnum is 5.0.1. You seem to be running a later dev
release. Perhaps sine regression got introduced in that build?
-Erik
On Sep 29, 2017 8:59 AM, "Andy Wojnarek"
wrote:
So I started a fresh install of Pike on OpenSuSE in my test lab at work,
and I’m having a hard time ge
Hey Ops folks,
A Ceph session was put on the discussion Etherpad for the forum, and I
know a lot of folks have expressed interest in doing one, especially
since there's no Ceph Day going on this time around.
I need a volunteer to run the session and set up an agenda. If you're
willing and able to
On Sep 28, 2017 4:31 AM, "Lee Yarwood" wrote:
On 20-09-17 14:56:20, arkady.kanev...@dell.com wrote:
> Lee,
> I can chair meeting in Sydney.
> Thanks,
> Arkady
Thanks Arkady!
FYI I see that emccormickva has created the following Forum session to
discuss FF upgrades:
http://forumtopics.openstack
My main question here would be this: If you feel there are deficiencies in
Ironic, why not contribute to improving Ironic rather than spawning a whole
new project?
I am happy to take a look at it, and I'm by no means trying to contradict
your assumptions here. I just get concerned with the overhea
Sorry, clipboard fail. Thanks!
On Sep 26, 2017 11:54 AM, "Jimmy McArthur" wrote:
> I think you want this page, actualy: http://forumtopics.openstack.org/
>
> Erik McCormick
> September 26, 2017 at 9:53 AM
> Hey Ops folks,
>
> We are in the process of submi
Hey Ops folks,
We are in the process of submitting sessions the Forum to the
foundation tool. You can see what is in so far here:
http://forumtopics.openstack.org/cfp/
I wanted to give everyone one last chance to go to
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/SYD-ops-session-ideas and add session
ideas,
Hello Ops!
As a followup to this, the Ops Meetup Team has set up a brainstorming
etherpad to discuss possible forum sessions for Sydney.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/SYD-ops-session-ideas
This works the same as our Ops Mid-Cycle meetups. Post your session
ideas, comment on other listed propo
On Jul 28, 2017 8:51 AM, "John Petrini" wrote:
Hi Saverio,
Thanks for the info. The parameter is missing completely:
I've came across the blueprint for adding the image property
hw_vif_multiqueue_enabled. Do you know if this feature is available in
I am personally in favor of many Ceph sessions. As you suggested
below, you should pitch your sessions when the forum session process
starts. I'm sure you'll receive plenty of traffic. If you're
interested in coming to Mexico City August 9 - 10, or would like us to
discuss some Ceph-related topics
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Marc Heckmann
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 10:09 -0500, Lance Bragstad wrote:
>>
>> Also, with all the people involved with this thread, I'm curious what the
>> best way is to get consens
I've been running Ceph-backed Cinder since, I think, Icehouse. It's really
more of a function of your backend or the hypervisor than Cinder itself.
That being said, it's been probabky mt smallest Openstack pain point iver
the years.
I can't imagine what sort of concurrency issues you'd run into sh
Hello Ops,
We have begun planning the details for our next mid-cycle meetup in
Mexico City, August 9 and 10th. We need help from all of you to come
up with session ideas and to provide feedback on the proposals of
others. Even if you are not planning to attend, your feedback would be
appreciated.
LISTEN
> tcp6 0 0 192.168.241.114:8778192.168.241.115:50734 TIME_WAIT
> tcp6 0 0 192.168.241.114:8778192.168.241.115:50736 FIN_WAIT2
>
> This placement thing is new to Ocata right?
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew Wojnarek | Sr. Systems Engine
You'll want to check the nova-scheduler.log (controller) and the
nova-compute.log (compute). You can look for your request ID and then
go forward from there. Those should shed some more light on what the
issue is
-Erik
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Andy Wojnarek
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have a
I'm floating this dev thread over to ops as I imagine recent layoffs
could have affected some of you folks also, and ops are people too!
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-April/115812.html
Short version is, if you were planning to, or would like to attend the
Openstack Summi
Sorry for slacking off. I'm out on vacation this week. I'll be there next
week for sure!
Cheers,
Erik
On Apr 11, 2017 11:55 AM, "Chris Morgan" wrote:
> Today's meeting was very thinly attended (minutes and log below). I would
> like to encourage as many as possible openstack operators (particul
Is there any possible way to push this deadline out a week? I ask only
because my brain hurts focusing on sessions for the midcycle, and things
will almost certainly come up in Milan that will spawn ideas for the forum.
I know everything is on a tight schedule, but just wanted to throw this out
th
Hello Ops,
I have set up a skeleton etherpad for the Bare Metal session at the
midcycle meetup in Milan. Please take a few minutes and add any topics
you wish to discuss, or expand on anything that is already there. We
welcome submissions from anyone, even if you're not planning to attend
the even
included.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MIL-ops-meetup
Additionally, we could use a couple more moderators. If you are
willing to moderate a session, please add your name to the list below
the sessions.
Thanks,
Erik
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Erik McCormick
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
Hello everyone,
If you would like to have input into what sessions we have during the
Milan meetup in March, now is the time. Please head over to
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MIL-ops-meetup and either add new
session suggestions, or +1 those already on the list.
We will be closing submissions
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Mike Lowe wrote:
> I got a rather nasty surprise upgrading from CentOS 7.2 to 7.3. As far as I
> can tell the libvirt 2.0.0 that ships with 7.3 doesn’t behave the same way as
> the 1.2.17 that ships with 7.2 when using ceph with cephx auth during volume
> atta
+1 for later from me as well. I could also probably swing 23:00 if
we're trying to accommodate Shintaro and he can be online at 7am Tokyo
time. 12:30 or 13:00 would be OK also but that would make things
really rough for any west coast people.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Matt Jarvis wrote:
>
-
>> From: Matthias Runge
>> To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
>> Cc:
>> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] 2017 Openstack Operators Mid-Cycle
Meetups - venue selection etherpads
>> Date: Thu, Oct 27, 2016 5:33 AM
>>
>> On 27/10/16 11:08, Erik
The PTG is for devs to get together and get real work done. We would be a
distraction from that goal. They will also be attending the forum which
will run with the summits and will be able to spend more time in groups
with ops for requirements gathering and such.
-Erik
On Oct 27, 2016 11:05 AM, "
On Jul 31, 2016 8:32 PM, "Sam Morrison" wrote:
>
> Hi Gordon,
>
> We are using the influxDB backend and we have our retention policies set
to:
>
> Every minute for an hour
> Every 10 minutes for a day
> Every hour for a year
>
> Currently we hover around 8,000 instances.
>
> We understand the infl
I've recently gone through provisioning Midonet (open source version) with
the intent of tying their vxlan gateway in with my Cumulus switches. This
approach should be usable with pretty much any vxlan-capable switch. If
you're open to straying from the well travelled OVS/LB path, you may want
to c
+1 for the "unless otherwise stated" bit. I seem to recall some
non-standard requirements from the likes of HP. Apache should be a good
default though.
-Erik
On Nov 19, 2015 11:31 PM, "Matt Fischer" wrote:
> Is there a reason why we can't license the entire repo with Apache2 and if
> you want to
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Jonathan D. Proulx wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 03:44:03PM -0500, Erik McCormick wrote:
> :I'm still fishing for more specific details, but here is a snapshot of
> :how the Ceph Development Summit is handled.
> :
> :http://tracker.ceph.co
I'm still fishing for more specific details, but here is a snapshot of
how the Ceph Development Summit is handled.
http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/wiki/CDS_Jewel
It was previously done via Google Hangouts, but is now done using
Bluejeans. This is interesting especially since I believe Bluej
nd, then we have something to strive for next time. I think we can
all agree on a goal of extending participation as best we can without
creating an impediment to getting real work done.
>
> - jlk
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Erik McCormick
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Donald Talton wrote:
> If only there we some kind of chat medium where people could listen in to
> the live meetup and follow along in chat…
>
>
>
> Seriously though, how hard is it to find/designate someone as an IRC
> translator for the main points of discussion?
I thought we were working toward a regional approach rather than
having an "official" single meetup. Are you proposing to scrap the
North America meetup entirely? What does official vs. unofficial
entail?
-Erik
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Jonathan Proulx wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> 1st User Commi
I've been building these and running them on CentOS for a while,
mainly to get RBD support. They work fine.
http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/7Server/en/RHEV/SRPMS/
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Arne Wiebalck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What about the CentOS Virt SIG’s repo at
>
> http
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Mark Baker wrote:
> Worth mentioning that OpenStack releases that come out at the same time as
> Ubuntu LTS releases (12.04 + Essex, 14.04 + Icehouse, 16.04 + Mitaka) are
> supported for 5 years by Canonical so are already kind of an LTS. Support in
> this context
Which table are you all at?
On Oct 29, 2015 11:53 PM, "Belmiro Moreira" <
moreira.belmiro.email.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Belmiro
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, 29 October 2015, Kris G. Lindgren
> wrote:
>
>> We seem to have enough interest… so meeting time will be at 10am in the
>> Prince room (i
I attempted to run it in Juno a while back and had very little
success. I would love to be able to use it though, and will give it
another shot once upgraded to Kilo. My issue was that several of the
options coded into it for firing up a connection were specific to
Freeswan which was deprecated, at
Hi Cynthia,
The master branch is Kilo. I haven't tried it yet, so I can't testify to
the completeness, but they should be mostly good by this point. There might
be a few features not implemented yet (keystone federation for one), but
all of the common stuff should be there. Drop by #puppet-opensta
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 5:34 AM, Tim Bell wrote:
> I had understood that CentOS 7.1 qemu-kvm has RBD support built-in. It
> was not there on 7.0 but http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10480 implies it
> is in 7.1.
>
>
>
> You could check on the centos mailing lists to be sure.
>
>
>
> Tim
>
>
It's ab
If you have the power to put it in Sched, that would be spiffy I say.
On May 18, 2015 9:22 PM, "Lauren Sell" wrote:
> Would you like us to make these updates in sched? It's no problem
>
>
>
>
> On May 18, 2015 9:11:35 PM Jonathan Proulx wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>>
>> If you look at the Sched for Wedn
We had this discussion at the Ops Mid-Cycle meetup. I think the general
consensus was 0.9 for memory. if you're running Ceph OSD's on the node
you'll almost certainly want to reserve more than a gig for it and the OS.
for CPU there was a wide range of ideas and it mainly depended on use-case.
If y
I'll start by saying I went the system bundle route also and have thus far
had no issues with it. I'll also say that I'm using RDO packages still and
not doing anything with venvs or pip installed stuff.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Michael Still wrote:
> Thanks for starting this thread Jess
That looks like a database connection error, not a keystone error. Double
check your DB connection string / credentials and see if you can connect
with the mysql client.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Nathan Stratton wrote:
> Sorry about that, never thought to look in registry.log, it points to
Also, can you run the cinder command with --debug and paste the out put
here, and check cinder-api and cinder-volume logs for relevant errors
related to the request.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Britt Houser (bhouser)
wrote:
> What distribution is this? If RedHat based, try turning selinu
Matias,
This is great stuff! Thanks for sharing. I came up with something similar
this past weekend, but I then ran into the issue where the PID file was
left behind whenever Pluto gets restarted (which happens constantly). Did
you run into that issue?
Thanks,
Erik
On Feb 3, 2015 11:37 PM, "Matia
ds on what is broken.
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Alex Leonhardt
wrote:
> Thanks, I'll try and find out next time this happens.
>
> To be precise though, the state is BUILD and the Task stays at "Build" (as
> if some API call timed out??)...
>
> Alex
>
On Jan 9, 2015 4:43 AM, "Alex Leonhardt" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> recently I started having problems when creating instances - "every now
and then" they seem to get stuck in a 'Build' state. After I terminate that
instance and try again, it mostly goes through fine. This is happening
across multiple pro
hich cause this issue, please
> upgrade glance_store to latest 0.1.9 in your environment.
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:45 AM, Erik McCormick <
> emccorm...@cirrusseven.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I've got a new deployment of Juno backed by Ceph set
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
> So, how about maintaining a set of pointers to the github repos where we
> are all working ?
>
>
I think this is more unsustainable than the osops repo itself. Rather than
having the relevant things in one place, there's now a set of pointers to
Hi everyone,
I've got a new deployment of Juno backed by Ceph set up and am getting a
rather unhelpful error message when attempting to download a stored image
out of Glance. I have no trouble uploading images or listing the image
details, and I'm able to manually manipulate and copy the image fil
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:43 AM, MailingLists - EWS <
mailingli...@expresswebsystems.com> wrote:
> Since there seems to be a fair amount of people on this list running Ceph
> with Openstack, I wanted to ask what configuration most people are using
> for their Ceph/Openstack configuration.
>
>
>
>
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:08 AM, Jesse Pretorius
wrote:
> I'd like to clarify a few things, specifically related to Ceph usage, in
> less of a rushed response. :)
>
> Note - my production experience has only been with Ceph Dumpling. Plenty
> of great patches which resolve many of the issues I've e
I'm mostly a stalker on this list, but if anyone's input is welcome, then a
big fat +1 to George's comments from me. I just patched Bash versions from
EL 4 systems for Shellshock. The least we can do is patch one-ago versions
for vulnerabilities.
-Erik
On Sep 29, 2014 7:41 PM, "George Shuklin" wr
Hey folks,
So I've been through a number of POC and smaller deployment clusters since
Folsom, but I'm now working on one that should be a good bit larger and
have a much greater need for HA. The diagrams that I originally drew up
that seemed reasonable a few months ago are in conflict with a lot o
90 matches
Mail list logo
