+1
I would much rather see this be a feature of any one of the vast number of
deployment tools vs. creating yet another CM repo.
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 5:26 PM, James Denton
wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> Can I ask how Kolla would differ from another project on StackForge
> known as OpenStack Ansibl
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 5:08 AM, Michael Chapman wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Craig Tracey
> wrote:
>
>> Great input Kris. We also took a look at Anvil, and as you mention it is
>> heavily biased for RH based distros.
>>
>> With regar
_______
>
> Kris Lindgren
> Senior Linux Systems Engineer
> GoDaddy, LLC.
>
>
> From: Craig Tracey
> Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 at 12:59 PM
> To: Adam Young
> Cc: "openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org" <
> open
Thanks Michael for continuing this conversation. This is something that we
are particularly interested and involved in.
A while back (around the first Ops mid-cycle), I along with John Dewey
started a project called giftwrap https://github.com/blueboxgroup/giftwrap.
The primary objective was to b
Agree with Mike 1000%.
This is something we should have done ages ago, and being agnostic is the
correct way to get traction on this stuff. We'll be happy to help.
Thanks for championing this!
On Nov 10, 2014 11:37 AM, "Michael Chapman" wrote:
> Here's the etherpad from Friday:
> https://etherp
+1000 to what Matt said.
Another point worth considering is that "operations"-type projects are
often in a fast-follow mode. All of areas of interest (logging, packaging,
monitoring, etc.) are effectively out of band from anything OpenStack
proper. We should be able to release these at our own c
Hey Abel,
We would be in favor of this as well. So much so that we would definitely
be willing to put some resources on it. I'll reach out once we're back from
Paris.
Great suggestion,
Craig
On Oct 31, 2014 2:52 PM, "Abel Lopez" wrote:
> I've added the same blueprint to cinder/glance/etc. yes,
