Hi James,
James Penick wrote:
Hey folks,
Does anyone have experience using zookeeper or redis to handle HA failover
in cinder clusters?
I'm guessing you mean failover of an active/passive cinder-volume
service?
I know there's docs on pacemaker, however we already
have the other two installe
Jean-Philippe Méthot wrote:
Hi,
I’ve noticed that in the high-availability guide, it is not
recommended to run cinder-volume in an active-active configuration.
Active-active cinder-volume support is still in development, e.g. see
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/cinder-v
[Adding openstack-sigs list too; apologies for the extreme
cross-posting, but I think in this case the discussion deserves wide
visibility. Happy to be corrected if there's a better way to handle
this.]
Hi James,
James Page wrote:
Hi All
tl;dr we (the original founders) have not managed to i
Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi! Quick heads-up:
Following a request[1] from Adam Spiers (SIG lead), we modified the
PTG schedule to move the Self-Healing SIG meeting from Friday (all
day) to Thursday morning (only morning). You can see the resulting
schedule at:
https://www.openstack.org/ptg
Erik McCormick wrote:
Looping the list back in since I accidentally dropped it yet again :/
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Torin Woltjer
wrote:
That's good to know, thank you. Out of curiousity, without
pacemaker/chorosync, does haproxy have the capability to manage a floating
ip and failov
Hi all,
I just posted a summary of the Self-healing SIG session at the Dublin
PTG:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-sigs/2018-March/000317.html
If you are interested in the topic of self-healing within OpenStack,
you are warmly invited to subscribe to the openstack-sigs mailing
Hi all,
Yushiro kindly created an etherpad for the self-healing SIG session at
the Dublin PTG on Tuesday afternoon next week, and I've fleshed it out
a bit:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/self-healing-ptg-rocky
Anyone with an interest in self-healing is of course very welcome to
attend (or
As per below, I'm happy to announce that the Self-healing SIG is now
officially formed. For now, all discussions will happen on
, so please subscribe to that list
if you are interested in this topic!
Cheers,
Adam
- Forwarded message from Adam Spiers -
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 14:
Hi Imtiaz,
Imtiaz Chowdhury wrote:
I am looking for recommendations for an automated test framework can
be used to test different Openstack HA failure scenarios. I know that
Openstack Rally has some support but shall appreciate feedback on any
HA test framework others have used and found useful
-)
Thanks!
Adam
- Forwarded message from Adam Spiers -
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 23:35:02 +0100
From: Adam Spiers
To: OpenStack SIGs list
Subject: [Openstack-sigs] [meta] Proposal for self-healing SIG
Hi all,
[TL;DR: we want to set up a "self-healing infrastructure" SIG.]
Hi all,
Sam P wrote:
This is a quick reminder for HA Forum session at Boston Summit.
Thank you all for your comments and effort to make this happen in Boston Summit.
Time: Thu 11 , 11:00am-11:40am
Location: Hynes Convention Center - Level One - MR 103
Etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p
Rochelle Grober wrote:
Please add your comments, suggestions, info, etc. to the Rabbitmq with HA
pitfalls etherpad. There are a few things out there already that will
hopefully induce more and better items to include.
See you tomorrow!
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MIL-ops-rabbitmq-pitfa
Adam Spiers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I doubt anyone would dispute that High Availability is a really
> important topic within OpenStack, yet none of the OpenStack
> conferences or Design Summits so far have provided an "official" track
> or similar dedicated space
Hi all,
I doubt anyone would dispute that High Availability is a really
important topic within OpenStack, yet none of the OpenStack
conferences or Design Summits so far have provided an "official" track
or similar dedicated space for discussion on HA topics.
This is becoming increasingly problema
Hi everyone,
I have proposed moving the weekly High Availability IRC meetings one
hour later, back to the original time of 0900 UTC every Monday.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/349601/
Everyone is welcome to attend these meetings, so if you think you are
likely to regularly attend, feel free
Juvonen, Tomi (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote:
> Thank you very much from the interest. Need to look over other
> discussion and perhaps have a session in Barcelona to look the
> way forward after change in Nova.
Indeed, sounds good!
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ada
Hi Tomi,
Juvonen, Tomi (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote:
> I'm working in the OPNFV Doctor project that is about fault
> management and maintenance (NFV). The goal of the project is to
> build fault management and maintenance framework for high
> availability of Network Services on top of virtualized
> i
:
a) whether you think our proposal to create four new user stories
for each of these makes sense, and
b) feedback on any of the individual usage scenarios.
Thanks a lot!
Adam
- Forwarded message from Adam Spiers -
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 00:19:52 +0100
From: Adam Spiers
To
Hi all, sorry I am late to this thread but I only just noticed it.
Affan is exactly right. Architecting new cloud-native apps is
obviously the ideal approach, but unfortunately the demands of the
real-world mean that it is not possible to do this for all legacy
workloads in a timely manner.
I co
Sorry! It would have helped if I'd used the right address for the
openstack list in the To: and Reply-To: headers :-/
Hopefully second time lucky ...
Adam Spiers wrote:
> [cross-posting to several lists; please trim the recipients list
> before replying!]
>
> Hi all,
>
[cross-posting to several lists; please trim the recipients list
before replying!]
Hi all,
After discussion with members of the openstack-infra team, I
registered new FreeNode IRC channel #openstack-ha. Discussion on all
aspects of OpenStack High Availability is welcome in this channel.
Hopefull
21 matches
Mail list logo