Re: [Openstack-operators] nova-placement-api tuning

2018-03-30 Thread iain MacDonnell
On 03/29/2018 02:13 AM, Belmiro Moreira wrote: Some lessons so far... - Scale keystone accordingly when enabling placement. Speaking of which; I suppose I have the same question for keystone (currently running under httpd also). I'm currently using threads=1, based on this (IIRC): https:/

Re: [Openstack-operators] RFC: Next minimum libvirt / QEMU versions for "Solar" release

2018-03-30 Thread Melvin Hillsman
;) On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > > While at it, we should also discuss about what will be the NEXT_MIN > > libvirt and QEMU versions for the "Solar" release. To that end, I've > > spent going through different distributions and updated the > > DistroSupportMatrix Wiki[

Re: [Openstack-operators] RFC: Next minimum libvirt / QEMU versions for "Solar" release

2018-03-30 Thread Sean McGinnis
> While at it, we should also discuss about what will be the NEXT_MIN > > libvirt and QEMU versions for the "Solar" release. To that end, I've > > spent going through different distributions and updated the >

[Openstack-operators] RFC: Next minimum libvirt / QEMU versions for "Solar" release

2018-03-30 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
The last version bump was in "Pike" release (commit: b980df0, 11-Feb-2017), and we didn't do any bump during "Queens". So it's time to increment the versions (which will also makes us get rid of some backward compatibility cruft), and pick future versions of libvirt and QEMU.