Dear Openstack Users,
Awaiting your kind response please!
Our environment is in hanged situation because of above mentioned issue.
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Gurpreet Thind
wrote:
> Hi Openstack Operators,
>
> We wanted to install gnocchi on our openstack environment(Liberty). It was
> s
On 4/6/2017 7:34 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
While working on trying to trim some RPC traffic between compute nodes
and the scheduler [1] I came across the TypeAffinityFilter which relies
on the instance.instance_type_id field, which is the original flavor.id
(primary key) that the instance was cre
Great Edmund! We’d appreciate that.
-Ron
From: Edmund Rhudy (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK) [mailto:erh...@bloomberg.net]
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2017 12:43 PM
To: De Rose, Ronald
Cc: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re:[Openstack-operators] Operator feedback on App Keys...
We have had
While working on trying to trim some RPC traffic between compute nodes
and the scheduler [1] I came across the TypeAffinityFilter which relies
on the instance.instance_type_id field, which is the original flavor.id
(primary key) that the instance was created with on a given host. The
idea being
We have had internal discussions about app keys in Keystone and would be very
happy to see it implemented (and to assist with the implementation where
possible).
From: ronald.de.r...@intel.com
Subject: Re:[Openstack-operators] Operator feedback on App Keys...
During the PTG, the keyston
Hi All,
Below is the link to the weekly meeting summary. There are a lot of exciting ML
work being performed by the team.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Fault-Genes
thanks,
Nemat
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.open
During the PTG, the keystone team had a lengthy discussion on a new security
credential for applications/scripts/3rd party tools, to avoid having to put
username/password in configuration files. The following is a spec that
addresses this feature by implementing App Keys to be used for applicat
Hi Tim,
It does seem feasible, but imagine the aggregate juggling... it's
something of an indictment that from where we are today this seems
like a step forward. I'm not a fan of pushing that load onto operators
when it seems like what we actually need is fully-fledged workload
scheduling in Nova.
Hi Jay,
On 5 April 2017 at 03:21, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 04/03/2017 06:07 PM, Blair Bethwaite wrote:
>> That's something of an oversimplification. A reservation system
>> outside of Nova could manipulate Nova host-aggregates to "cordon off"
>> infrastructure from on-demand access (I believe Blazar
Hi all,
I'm late to the discussion.
Some of members in Blazar's team have an interest from NFV side for the
resource reservation. So we have one usecase that telecom operators
want to reserve instance slots at a specific time window because of
expected workload increasing.
I'm thinking the
10 matches
Mail list logo
