Hi Serg,
We were indeed hitting that bug, but the cert wasn't self-signed. It was
easier for us to manually patch the Ubuntu Cloud package of Murano with the
stable/mitaka fix linked in that bug report than trying to debug where
OpenSSL/python/requests/etc was going awry.
We might redeploy Murano
Hi Joe,
>Also, is it safe to say that communication between agent/engine only, and will
>only, happen during app deployment?
murano-agent & murano-engine keep active connection to the Rabbit MQ
broker but message exchange happens only during deployment of the app.
>One thing we just ran into, t
In Fuel we deploy haproxy to all of the nodes that are part of the
VIP/endpoint service (This is usually part of the controller role) Then the
vips (internal or public) can be active on any member of the group.
Corosync/Pacemaker is used to move the VIP address (as apposed to
keepalived) in our cas
I figure if you have entity Y's workloads running on entity X's hardware...
and that's 51% or greater portion of gross revenue... you are a public
cloud.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Kenny Johnston
wrote:
> That seems like a strange definition. It doesn't incorporate the usual
> multi-tenan
That seems like a strange definition. It doesn't incorporate the usual
multi-tenancy requirement that traditionally separates private from public
clouds. By that definition, Rackspace's Private Cloud offer, where we
design, deploy and operate a single-tenant cloud on behalf of customers (in
their d
Hello operators,
At GARR in Rome there will be an event shortly before Barcelona about
Openstack and Identity Federation.
https://eventr.geant.org/events/2527
This is a use case that is very important for NREN running public
cloud for Universities, where a Identity Federation is already
deployed
Well it seems that I’m out of luck with the nova migrate function
2016-09-26 12:16:06.249 28226 INFO nova.compute.manager
[req-bfccd77e-b351-4c30-a5a4-a0e20fc62add 98b4044d95e34926aa53405f2b7c5a13
1dda2478e30d44dda0ca752c6047725d - - -] [instance:
b98be860-9253-43a1-9351-36a7aa125a51] Setting
Agreed. i'm doing some benchmarking myself currently which i will
publish soon. whenever y'all do start testing, we welcome any feedback.
On 26/09/2016 4:43 AM, Tobias Urdin wrote:
> Hello Gordon,
>
> I have talked to a lot of different people at various companies, most of
> them (including us) h
Hello Gordon,
I have talked to a lot of different people at various companies, most of
them (including us) has been looking towards Gnocchi and and surely
gonna use it in the future however it's still missing packaging,
documentation and production testing (being used in production).
Therefore it
Hi Blair
Agree with you on a lot of that stuff, although on lifecycle management we
certainly have a bunch of tooling in place to handle scenarios like initial
creation of user environments ( basic network and router setup ), freezing
resources for non-payment, offboarding of customers after accou
Hi Matt,
I think your dot points make sense. And yes, I was thinking about Science
Cloud overlap. I see Science Clouds as potentially sharing most or all of
these attributes (with the notable exception being charging in terms of end
users seeing a $ figure, showback and/or instance/cpu hour quotas
11 matches
Mail list logo
