We don't use FWaaS but we certainly are interested in LBaaS and VPNaaS.
Chalk us up to a vendor trying to implement these. VPNaaS is huge as it
allows customers to non-disruptively attach their organizations to a public
cloud with the same IP space as is the case with AWS. I'd be open to
letting th
We have actually started to look at VPNaaS as a way to tie two different
region's Tenant Networks together.. This will hopefully allow us to not
have to look at users using too many Floating IPs to just support tools and
products that have issues with Floating IPs.
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 4:18 AM
Ha, yeah have come across this too in our tempest runs. Haven’t had a chance to
look into it yet. But I think you are on the right track. Just need to modify
the tests.
Cheers,
Sam
> On 20 May 2016, at 1:25 AM, Mike Dorman wrote:
>
> We are struggling a bit with the "Send up AZ and instance
Hi Edgar,
> On May 19, 2016, at 7:00 PM, Edgar Magana wrote:
>
> Shamail and Team,
>
> Where are we I defining the activities for recognizing OpenStack Users? In my
> mind we have completed the definition and we agreed on:
> AUC – Active User Contributor
> We encourage the following activitie
Shamail and Team,
Where are we I defining the activities for recognizing OpenStack Users? In my
mind we have completed the definition and we agreed on:
AUC – Active User Contributor
We encourage the following activities:
* Organizers of any of the groups.openstack.org
* Active members an
> On May 19, 2016, at 6:23 PM, Edgar Magana wrote:
>
> This location sounds fantastic! I will go for Seattle!
+1
>
> Edgar
>
>> On 5/17/16, 8:13 AM, "Kingshott, Daniel"
>> wrote:
>>
>> Just so we have this out there for the Seattle BestBuy location:
>>
>> 200 person theatre - Full A/V, V
This location sounds fantastic! I will go for Seattle!
Edgar
On 5/17/16, 8:13 AM, "Kingshott, Daniel" wrote:
>Just so we have this out there for the Seattle BestBuy location:
>
>200 person theatre - Full A/V, VC facilities.
>6 breakout meeting rooms, one seats 5, the others seat 10+ - all have
Awesome progress folks! So glad to see this well defined!
I always wanted to have a “safe” environment for these discussions.
Edgar
From: Chris Morgan
Date: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 9:34 AM
To: Matt Jarvis
Cc: OpenStack Operators
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Updated definition of 'users'
+1 for Ihar¹s comments, the issue you will have is the deb packages will
have dependencies that will be a huge pain, you would have to spin up a
separate set of boxes for neutron and update the keystone endpoint.
Daniel Kingshott
Cloud Dude
(425) 623 4359 - Cell
Best Buy Co. Inc.
Technology Dev
Akshik, please include the address of the original mailing list in your replies.
> On 19 May 2016, at 22:17, Akshik dbk wrote:
>
> Hi Ihar,
>
> Thanks for the response,
>
> yes, Fuel does not run in containers
>
> correct me if I’m wrong, so upgrading neutron dependencies would have impact
> On 19 May 2016, at 21:43, Akshik dbk wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I’m have a Fuel 7.0 based environment [kilo], wanted to upgrade the Neutron
>> to Mitaka version. is it possible to upgrade Neutron alone to the Mitaka
>> version.
Developers don’t make any special effort to support mixed environme
Hi,
I’m have a Fuel 7.0 based environment [kilo], wanted to upgrade the Neutron to
Mitaka version. is it possible to upgrade Neutron alone to the Mitaka version.
if so can someone point me to right direction.
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenSt
Thanks for the reminder Matt!
--
Melvin Hillsman
Ops Technical Lead
OpenStack Innovation Center
mrhills...@gmail.com
phone: (210) 312-1267
mobile: (210) 413-1659
Learner | Ideation | Belief | Responsibility | Command
http://osic.org
From: Matt Van Winkle
Date: Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 10:17 AM
We are struggling a bit with the "Send up AZ and instance_name in system
metadata” patch. It works fine under normal circumstances, but if there is a
scheduler error (No valid host was found), then there is a failure when
transitioning the instance to an error state, and the instance gets stuck
Hello LDT folks!
Just a reminder that our May meeting is in a little less than 12 hours. This
month is or APAC friendly time slot. See you all in #openstack-operators
tonight/tomorrow morning!
Thanks!
VW
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStac
Sorry, my email client didn’t properly thread replies, so I just saw Simon’s
reply. Seems that setting limit -1 is effectively telling it to paginate, so
feel free to ignore that suggestion :-D
We should perhaps still consider a better way to let people know that’s
happening. At the very least
Given that there’s already the ability to start listing from a specific
VM/UUID, it seems like we should add some pagination functionality in there.
Maybe we need to add an “—all” flag or something which is non-admin and returns
all VMs for the specific tenant. Then if someone really does want a
In fact, both of you are correct. When passing '--limit -1' to the Nova
client, it will issue multiple requests to the API using the --marker
option until it receives no more data [1]. So the server-side limit
(osapi_max_limit parameter) isn't by-passed, it's just the client that
deals with it.
BR,
18 matches
Mail list logo
