Re: [Openstack-operators] What are you excited for in Mitaka?

2016-03-10 Thread chrishull42
Well. The fact that I've built a flexible engine that can install Liberty +. And I shall test it. :) - Chris http://chrishull.com/career/openstack/index.html Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 10, 2016, at 9:28 PM, Tom Fifield wrote: > > Genius > >> On 11/03/16 13:18, Steve Martinelli wrote:

Re: [Openstack-operators] What are you excited for in Mitaka?

2016-03-10 Thread Tom Fifield
Genius On 11/03/16 13:18, Steve Martinelli wrote: We actually just sneaked in an enhancement to keystone-manage bootstrap; a user may optionally pass in the URLs needed to create the keystone/identity service in the service catalog. After running the single command, you'll be able to authentica

Re: [Openstack-operators] What are you excited for in Mitaka?

2016-03-10 Thread Steve Martinelli
We actually just sneaked in an enhancement to keystone-manage bootstrap; a user may optionally pass in the URLs needed to create the keystone/identity service in the service catalog. After running the single command, you'll be able to authenticate with the admin user name and password and start cr

Re: [Openstack-operators] What are you excited for in Mitaka?

2016-03-10 Thread Tom Fifield
Nice one :) I found another one, from keystone: keystone-manage bootstrap it creates an admin user, project and role and assigns the user to the project. 4 commands now one! On 10/03/16 13:55, Edgar Magana wrote: I really like the MTU one! That was a good hit! Edgar From: Matt Kassawara m

Re: [Openstack-operators] Cloud Upgrade Strategies

2016-03-10 Thread Adam Lawson
DB needed for control but some clouds store tokens in sql as well as locally-defined users. Don't forget analytics and if you use things like contrail, you have cassandra/mongodb for peripheral services as well. We're continuing to iterate through the requirements against current reality - I appre

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Rally] Scale testing of openstack

2016-03-10 Thread Jesse Keating
If you have multiple networks, you have to define the one you want used. You can define it in the json.   In the args you need to add a nics block, that defines the net-id of the network you need. -jlk     - Original message -From: Akshay Kumar Sanghai To: Dina Belova Cc: openstack-operator

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Rally] Scale testing of openstack

2016-03-10 Thread Dina Belova
Thanks Boris! Akshay, please try the variant proposed by Boris. Cheers, Dina On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > Dina, > > It's not Rally bug, however it's UX issue. > > There are many networks, so rally should pick one of them, to pick every > time random network you shou

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Rally] Scale testing of openstack

2016-03-10 Thread Dina Belova
Hm, sounds like a bug.. + Andrey and Boris - possibly they can tell more.. On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 9:04 PM, Edgar Magana wrote: > I am including one of our Rally expert to provide some guidance! > > Kyle, please provide any details that you may have in mind. > > Thanks, > > Edgar > > From: Aksha

[Openstack-operators] KVM Forum 2016: Call For Participation

2016-03-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
= KVM Forum 2016: Call For Participation August 24-26, 2016 - Westin Harbor Castle - Toronto, Canada (All submissions must be received before midnight May 1, 2016) = KVM

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Rally] Scale testing of openstack

2016-03-10 Thread Edgar Magana
I am including one of our Rally expert to provide some guidance! Kyle, please provide any details that you may have in mind. Thanks, Edgar From: Akshay Kumar Sanghai mailto:akshaykumarsang...@gmail.com>> Date: Thursday, March 10, 2016 at 9:43 AM To: Dina Belova mailto:dbel...@mirantis.com>> Cc

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Rally] Scale testing of openstack

2016-03-10 Thread Akshay Kumar Sanghai
Hi Dina, Thanks for the reference. I edited the sample boot.json file and added the network context. It gives an error while executing the task: "Error BadRequest: Multiple possible networks found, use a Network ID to be more specific". I think because I have multiple networks, its asking for which

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Rally] Scale testing of openstack

2016-03-10 Thread Dina Belova
Akshay, you may try to use http://docs.openstack.org/developer/rally/plugin/plugin_reference.html#novaservers-boot-server-scenario and specify two contexts in the scenario configuration: user context for tenant creation and network context for networks creation for these tenants. Scenario itself w

Re: [Openstack-operators] What are you excited for in Mitaka?

2016-03-10 Thread Matt Kassawara
Marcus, Setting MTU from the API is a bad idea for many reasons. If you want to discuss it, please start a new thread on- or off-list. Matt On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 6:24 AM, Shake Chen wrote: > Now in OpenStack,vm snapshot just create image, backup not > support increment。 > > > > On Thu, Mar 1

[Openstack-operators] [Rally] Scale testing of openstack

2016-03-10 Thread Akshay Kumar Sanghai
Hi, I have a openstack setup with 1 controller node, 1 network node and 2 compute nodes. I want to perform scale testing of the setup in the following manner: - Create 10 tenants - Create 1 router per tenant - Create 100 neutron networks across 10 tenants attached to the router - Create 500 VMs sp

Re: [Openstack-operators] What are you excited for in Mitaka?

2016-03-10 Thread Shake Chen
Now in OpenStack,vm snapshot just create image, backup not support increment。 On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Marcus Furlong wrote: > On 10 March 2016 at 16:33, Matt Kassawara wrote: > > Don't forget about fixing MTU in neutron. No more confusing options that > > don't really do anything. >

[Openstack-operators] nova-conductor endless loop after boot (kilo)

2016-03-10 Thread John Stein
Hi all, I came across this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1460652 And I have some problems when I try to apply the suggested patches: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/252361/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/255530/ I run pip install on the requirements which goes fine, but when I try r