Look for an option called "socket" in your my.cnf which will point you to
the correct location of the socket file.
On 2 November 2015 at 22:20, Kyle Robertson wrote:
> Hello Everybody!
>
> I am experimenting with a small Openstack cloud, and I have encountered a
> problem on multiple occasions w
Hi Kevin,
Oops, noticed I didn't reply to all the first time.
I think it's great to see more people who want to collect and distil
knowledge like this. :)
Finally, I hate diverging resources, so if something like this already
> exists please speak up so we can focus our efforts on making sure th
The official documentation would greatly benefit from more practical
information such as tuning... most likely in the administration or
operations guide, at least for now. Ideally, I would like to see a
operators contribute documentation for complete production deployments that
others can use as a
Hello there,
Very interesting initiative ! I'm currently working on the performance
side too on our (french astrophysics cloud) OpenStack deployment but to
say so currently I'm just following what CERN did regarding to Nova/CPU
configuration.
It's essentially around KSM, NUMA, CPU pinning, EPT
Awesome start. Rabbit fd tweaks are the bane of every install...including some
of my own...
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Bringard (kevinbri) [mailto:kevin...@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2015 3:56 PM
To: OpenStack Operators
Subject: [Openstack-operators] OpenStack Tuning Gu
Great Kevin. Thanks for honchoing and sharing.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Kevin Bringard (kevinbri) <
kevin...@cisco.com> wrote:
> Hey all!
>
> Something that jumped out at me in Tokyo was how much it seemed that
> "basic" tuning stuff wasn't common knowledge. This was especially prevalent
>
Hey all!
Something that jumped out at me in Tokyo was how much it seemed that "basic"
tuning stuff wasn't common knowledge. This was especially prevalent in the
couple of rabbit talks I went to. So, in order to pool our resources, I started
an Etherpad titled the "OpenStack Tuning Guide"
(http
I reached out to nova today to see what is the best way forward on this patch
[1]. mriedem had created a blueprint skeleton for this already [2].
It sounds like it’s unlikely that nova would accept it, because it will require
a new CI job [3] and it goes against the philosophy of not adding to
Sorry, wrong link for [3] below.
On 11/4/15, 3:05 PM, "Mike Dorman" wrote:
>Thanks to everyone who was able to attend the LDT session in Tokyo! I wanted
>to just briefly summarize some of the key points and action items.
>
>* Neutron segmented/routed networks
> * Encourage you to follow & p
Thanks to everyone who was able to attend the LDT session in Tokyo! I wanted
to just briefly summarize some of the key points and action items.
* Neutron segmented/routed networks
* Encourage you to follow & provide feedback on the Neutron spec [1]
* Cells v1 Patches
* Many of the patches w
Hi Folks
The Cinder team is trying to plan our mid-cycle meetup again.
Can anybody interested in attending please fill out this quick survey to
help with planning, please?
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Q5FZX68
Closing date is 11th November.
Thanks
--
--
Duncan Thomas
___
Looking at the code in master (and ignoring tests), the only drivers I see
reference to volume_clear are the LVM and block device drivers:
$ git grep -l volume_clear
driver.py
drivers/block_device.py
drivers/lvm.py
utils.py
So other drivers (netapp, smb, gluster, and of course Ceph/RBD) simply
ig
On 11/04/2015 08:46 AM, Saverio Proto wrote:
Hello there,
I am using cinder with rbd, and most volumes are created from glance
images on rbd as well.
Because of ceph features, these volumes are CoW and only blocks
different from the original parent image are really written.
Today I am debugging
As many of you know, Liberty includes a bug fix for OVS L2 agent dropping
all flows when it starts up. Since this is a bug, I’d like to see this
back ported to Kilo if possible.
We’re planning to do an upgrade to the latest stable/kilo because of the
Nova NUMA issue anyway and we’re still using p
Hello there,
I am using cinder with rbd, and most volumes are created from glance
images on rbd as well.
Because of ceph features, these volumes are CoW and only blocks
different from the original parent image are really written.
Today I am debugging why in my production system deleting cinder
vo
I seem to have spotted the error, I'm using Puppet OpenStack Swift Module
https://github.com/openstack/puppet-swift/blob/master/manifests/storage/server.pp
and I seem to have missed the comments regarding permissions in rsyncd.conf
Frá: Davíð Örn Jóhannsson
Sen
Swift creates the folder with these permissions
drw-r--r-- 3 swift swift 53 Nov 3 15:53 fbc
but all other folders ar creteted with these permissions
drwxr-xr-x 3 swift swift 61 Nov 4 10:47 84990
Might the process responsible for creating these directories be misconfigured
to use 6
No, Local disks.
it seems that the /srv/node/Z302XK5V/objects/84990/fbc/ folder is being created
without execute permissions
Frá: Heiko Krämer
Sent: 04. nóvember 2015 10:18
Til: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
Efni: Re: [Openstack-operators] Permission
Hi,
you are using an shared storage such as NFS ?
total 0
d? ? ? ? ?? .
d? ? ? ? ?? ..
?? ? ? ? ?? 1710674aaa385fc75885b2ac7f8967c8
It looks like your file system is broken or your export of your shared
storage isn't working well.
Chee
I have a newly set up swift cluster that is generating a lot of error like this
where it seems that swift user does not have access to read permissions or
something
Nov 4 10:01:27 swift-04 object-auditor: ERROR Trying to audit
/srv/node/Z302XLHP/objects/11808/7c8/1710674aaa385fc75885b2ac7f896
20 matches
Mail list logo
