Hello,
I would like to invite everybody to become an active contributor for the
OpenStack Networking Guide: http://docs.openstack.org/networking-guide/
During the Liberty cycle we made a lot of progress and we feel that the guide
is ready to have even more contributions and formalize a bit more
Greetings! Our next OpenStack App Catalog meeting will take place this
Thursday October 8th at 17:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3
The agenda can be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/app-catalog
Please add agenda items if there's anything specific you would like to
discuss (or of
Thanks Edger for your reply. I checked the host VM it has enough
resources to create tiny instances. I noticed there was no br-int
present on controller+compute node. I don't know why it was not
present. I manually created br-int and also set-manager to odl 6640
port. Then, I am able to cr
tl;dr You must specify a domain when using domain scoped resources.
If you are using domains with puppet-keystone, there is a proposed patch
that will break backwards compatibility.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/226624/ Replace indirection calls
"Indirection calls are replaced with #fetch_
Please see inline.
___
Kris Lindgren
Senior Linux Systems Engineer
GoDaddy
On 10/7/15, 6:12 AM, "Tim Bell" wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Daniel P. Berrange [mailto:berra...@redhat.com]
>> Sent: 07 October
On 10/6/2015 11:49 AM, Mike Dorman wrote:
I posted a patch against one of the Nova DB archiving scripts in the
osops-tools-generic repo a few days ago to support additional tables:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/229013/2
We’d like a few more folks to review to make sure it looks good. Plea
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 12:37 AM, Edgar Magana
wrote:
> Review your nova-scheduler logs. It seems that yo have an issue with the
> resources available to host VMs.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Edgar
>
>
>
>
> On 10/6/15, 1:33 PM, "Irene Wu" wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >I was able to install a controller using devst
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel P. Berrange [mailto:berra...@redhat.com]
> Sent: 07 October 2015 13:25
> To: Tim Bell
> Cc: Sean Dague ; OpenStack Development Mailing List
> (not for usage questions) ; openstack-
> operat...@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [o
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 11:13:12AM +, Tim Bell wrote:
>
> Although Red Hat is no longer supporting RHEL 6 after Icehouse, a number of
> users such as GoDaddy and CERN are using Software Collections to run the
> Python 2.7 code.
Do you have any educated guess as to when you might switch to dep
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel P. Berrange [mailto:berra...@redhat.com]
> Sent: 07 October 2015 13:02
> To: Sean Dague
> Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> ; openstack-
> operat...@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev]
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 06:55:44AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 10/07/2015 06:46 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > In the Liberty version of OpenStack we had a min libvirt of 0.9.11 and
> > printed a warning on startup if you had < 0.10.2, to the effect that
> > Mitaka will required 0.10.2
> >
>
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 11:46:58AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> In the Liberty version of OpenStack we had a min libvirt of 0.9.11 and
> printed a warning on startup if you had < 0.10.2, to the effect that
> Mitaka will required 0.10.2
>
> This mail is a reminder that we will[1] mandate libv
In the Liberty version of OpenStack we had a min libvirt of 0.9.11 and
printed a warning on startup if you had < 0.10.2, to the effect that
Mitaka will required 0.10.2
This mail is a reminder that we will[1] mandate libvirt >= 0.10.2 when
Mitaka is released.
Looking forward to the N release,
13 matches
Mail list logo