On 01/29/2015 12:30 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
> Actually, many folks I spoke to didn't really care about this.
(computer) science isn't about voting.
On 01/29/2015 01:55 AM, Fischer, Matt wrote:
> Agreed completely. I know it wpn¹t be 100% perfect, but its 95% and
> right now I have 0%.
5% is enoug
Hi
This discussion came up at the cinder mid-cycle last week too, specifically
in the context of 'Can we change the details text in an existing error, or
is that an unacceptable API change'.
I have to second security / operational concerns about exposing too much
granularity of failure in these e
