Re: [Openstack-operators] Deprecation of in tree EC2 API in Nova for Kilo release

2015-01-28 Thread Saju M
I think, new EC2 API also uses EC2 API in the nova for basic operations. Only the new features like VPC is implemented in new EC2 API. So I think we should move it first. On Jan 29, 2015 5:42 AM, "Alex Baretto" wrote: > Hi Tim, > > Would you be able to share use cases/experiences with EC2 API to

Re: [Openstack-operators] Packaging sample config versions

2015-01-28 Thread Fischer, Matt
On 1/28/15, 4:45 PM, "Mathieu Gagné" wrote: >On 2015-01-28 6:30 PM, Tom Fifield wrote: >> On 29/01/15 07:28, Thomas Goirand wrote: >>> On 01/27/2015 11:00 PM, Tom Fifield wrote: Hi all, Based on Gustavo's excellent work below, talking with many ops, and after a brief chats wit

Re: [Openstack-operators] Deprecation of in tree EC2 API in Nova for Kilo release

2015-01-28 Thread Alex Baretto
Hi Tim, Would you be able to share use cases/experiences with EC2 API to help with support for your proposals? I am also familiar with multiple OpenStack clouds using the EC2 API. Best, -Alex. On 28 January 2015 at 12:38, Tim Bell wrote: > There are currently 35% of openstack clouds from the

Re: [Openstack-operators] Packaging sample config versions

2015-01-28 Thread Mathieu Gagné
On 2015-01-28 6:30 PM, Tom Fifield wrote: On 29/01/15 07:28, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 01/27/2015 11:00 PM, Tom Fifield wrote: Hi all, Based on Gustavo's excellent work below, talking with many ops, and after a brief chats with Jeremey and a few other TC folks, here's what I'd propose as an end

Re: [Openstack-operators] Small openstack

2015-01-28 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 12/20/2014 11:16 PM, George Shuklin wrote: > do 'network node on compute' is kinda sad Why? Thomas ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Packaging sample config versions

2015-01-28 Thread Tom Fifield
On 29/01/15 07:28, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 01/27/2015 11:00 PM, Tom Fifield wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Based on Gustavo's excellent work below, talking with many ops, and >> after a brief chats with Jeremey and a few other TC folks, here's what >> I'd propose as an end goal: >> >> * A git repositor

Re: [Openstack-operators] Packaging sample config versions

2015-01-28 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/27/2015 11:00 PM, Tom Fifield wrote: > Hi all, > > Based on Gustavo's excellent work below, talking with many ops, and > after a brief chats with Jeremey and a few other TC folks, here's what > I'd propose as an end goal: > > * A git repository that has raw, sample configs in it for each pr

Re: [Openstack-operators] Deprecation of in tree EC2 API in Nova for Kilo release

2015-01-28 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/28/2015 09:38 PM, Tim Bell wrote: > I would therefore propose that the new EC2 API modules are validated in > production and at scale before depreciating the existing functions. I think > validating, packaging and deploying to a reasonable number of clouds and > reviewing it with the opera

[Openstack-operators] Image snapshot keep in saving state backend with ceph

2015-01-28 Thread Zeeshan Ali Shah
Just add a bug here , feel free to comment. https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1415679 -- Regards Zeeshan Ali Shah System Administrator - PDC HPC PhD researcher (IT security) Kungliga Tekniska Hogskolan +46 8 790 9115 http://www.pdc.kth.se/members/zashah ___

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] Deprecation of in tree EC2 API in Nova for Kilo release

2015-01-28 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/28/2015 08:56 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > There is a new stackforge project which is getting some activity now - > https://github.com/stackforge/ec2-api. The intent and hope is that is > the path forward for the portion of the community that wants this > feature, and that efforts will be focused

Re: [Openstack-operators] Packaging sample config versions

2015-01-28 Thread George Shuklin
Yes! Just had have discussion about this with my colleague yesterday. Seems be perfect solution. On 01/28/2015 12:00 AM, Tom Fifield wrote: Hi all, Based on Gustavo's excellent work below, talking with many ops, and after a brief chats with Jeremey and a few other TC folks, here's what I'd pr

Re: [Openstack-operators] Deprecation of in tree EC2 API in Nova for Kilo release

2015-01-28 Thread Michael Still
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Tim Bell wrote: > There are currently 35% of openstack clouds from the survey using this > feature. I would therefore propose that this be reviewed with the operators > in detail before a rapid depreciation is performed. To the best of my > knowledge, the new p

Re: [Openstack-operators] Deprecation of in tree EC2 API in Nova for Kilo release

2015-01-28 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 08:38:02PM +, Tim Bell wrote: > There are currently 35% of openstack clouds from the survey using this > feature. I would therefore propose that this be reviewed with the > operators in detail before a rapid depreciation is performed. To the > best of my knowledge, the n

Re: [Openstack-operators] RHEL 7 / CentOS 7 instances losing their network gateway

2015-01-28 Thread Joe Topjian
I'm pretty sure I've resolved this issue. Since this seems to happen randomly, it might just be a coincidence that this is by far the longest streak that it hasn't happened. :) I noticed that CentOS 7 and RHEL 7 are setting a `valid_lft` and `preferred_lft` timeout on the IPv4 address. You can see

Re: [Openstack-operators] Deprecation of in tree EC2 API in Nova for Kilo release

2015-01-28 Thread Tim Bell
There are currently 35% of openstack clouds from the survey using this feature. I would therefore propose that this be reviewed with the operators in detail before a rapid depreciation is performed. To the best of my knowledge, the new package is not yet in use in production. At CERN, we are hi

Re: [Openstack-operators] Deprecation of in tree EC2 API in Nova for Kilo release

2015-01-28 Thread Christian Berendt
On 01/28/2015 08:56 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > Comments are welcomed, but we've attempted to get more people engaged to > address these issues over the last 18 months, and never really had > anyone step up. Without some real maintainers of this code in Nova (and > tests somewhere in the community) it'

[Openstack-operators] [Keystone] Deprecation of LDAP Assignment (Only Affects Project/Tenant/Role/Assignment info in LDAP)

2015-01-28 Thread Morgan Fainberg
To make it perfectly clear: We are NOT removing nor plan to remove the ability to use LDAP for users and groups in Keystone. NOTE: Please be sure to read the whole email AND FAQ before worrying about the impact of this deprecation. LDAP is used in Keystone as a backend for both the Identity (U

[Openstack-operators] Deprecation of in tree EC2 API in Nova for Kilo release

2015-01-28 Thread Sean Dague
The following review for Kilo deprecates the EC2 API in Nova - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/150929/ There are a number of reasons for this. The EC2 API has been slowly rotting in the Nova tree, never was highly tested, implements a substantially older version of what AWS has, and currently can

Re: [Openstack-operators] Specifying multiple tenants for aggregate_multitenancy_isolation_filter

2015-01-28 Thread matt
python-openstackclient had a csv output last i checked. On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:40 AM, Jesse Pretorius wrote: > On 28 January 2015 at 06:19, Tim Bell wrote: > >> +1 for commas. Configuration files with JSON is OK but commas for CLIs. >> > > +1 for commas from an operator perspective > >

Re: [Openstack-operators] Specifying multiple tenants for aggregate_multitenancy_isolation_filter

2015-01-28 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 28 January 2015 at 06:19, Tim Bell wrote: > +1 for commas. Configuration files with JSON is OK but commas for CLIs. > +1 for commas from an operator perspective ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lis